Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28859291›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Relevance of Spatial Heterogeneity of Immune Infiltration for Predicting Risk of Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy of ER+ Breast Cancer.

Andreas Heindl, Ivana Sestak, Kalnisha Naidoo, Jack Cuzick, Mitchell Dowsett, Yinyin Yuan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. RUNX1-deficiency drives immune-active ERbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Histolytics: A panoptic spatial analysis framework for interpretable histopathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas HeindlCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ivana SestakCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Kalnisha NaidooCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Jack CuzickCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Mitchell DowsettCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Yinyin YuanCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBBreast Cancer Now · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing evidence supporting the clinical utility of immune infiltration in the estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) subtype, the prognostic value of immune infiltration for ER+ disease is not well defined. Methods: Quantitative immune scores of cell abundance and spatial heterogeneity were computed using a fully automated hematoxylin and eosin-stained image analysis algorithm and spatial statistics for 1178 postmenopausal patients with ER+ breast cancer treated with five years' tamoxifen or anastrozole. The prognostic significance of immune scores was compared with Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score (RS), PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) score, IHC4, and clinical treatment score, available for 963 patients. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Scores of immune cell abundance were not associated with recurrence-free survival. In contrast, high immune spatial scores indicating increased cell spatial clustering were associated with poor 10-year, early (0-5 years), and late (5-10 years) recurrence-free survival (Immune Hotspot: LR-χ2 = 14.06, P < .001, for 0-10 years; LR-χ2 = 6.24, P = .01, for 0-5 years; LR-χ2 = 7.89, P = .005, for 5-10 years). The prognostic value of spatial scores for late recurrence was similar to that of IHC4 and RS in both populations, but was not as strong as other tests in comparison for recurrence across 10 years. Conclusions: These results provide a missing link between tumor immunity and disease outcome in ER+ disease by examining tumor spatial architecture. The association between spatial scores and late recurrence suggests a lasting memory of protumor immunity that may impact disease progression and evolution of endocrine treatment resistance, which may be exploited for therapeutic advances.

Indexed as

AgedAnastrozoleAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenRisk FactorsTamoxifenAnastrozoleAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID28859291
PMCPMC6298573
OpenAlexW2744335798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.