Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28859115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Development and validation of a rapid and robust method to determine visceral adipose tissue volume using computed tomography images.

Aaroh M Parikh, Adriana M Coletta, Z Henry Yu, Gaiane M Rauch, Joey P Cheung, Laurence E Court, Ann H Klopp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Optimizing CT-Based Models for Predicting Whole-Body Fat in Rabbits.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expected and paradoxical effects of obesity on cancer treatment response.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaroh M ParikhDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Adriana M ColettaDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Z Henry YuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Gaiane M RauchDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Joey P CheungDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Laurence E CourtDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ann H KloppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRice University · US

Funding

R25 SUPPLEMENT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY EDUCATIONR25CA057730 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, SHINE · 1992 to 2016
$18.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisceral adiposity is a risk factor for many chronic diseases. Existing methods to quantify visceral adipose tissue volume using computed tomographic (CT) images often use a single slice, are manual, and are time consuming, making them impractical for large population studies. We developed and validated a method to accurately, rapidly, and robustly measure visceral adipose tissue volume using CT images.

methodsIn-house software, Medical Executable for the Efficient and Robust Quantification of Adipose Tissue (MEERQAT), was developed to calculate visceral adipose tissue volume using a series of CT images within a manually identified region of interest. To distinguish visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, ellipses are drawn through the rectus abdominis and transverse abdominis using manual and automatic processes. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are calculated by counting the numbers of voxels corresponding to adipose tissue in the region of interest. MEERQAT's ellipse interpolation method was validated by comparing visceral adipose volume from 10 patients' CT scans with corresponding results from manually delineated scans. Accuracy of visceral adipose quantification was tested using a phantom consisting of animal fat and tissues. Robustness of the method was tested by determining intra-observer and inter-observer coefficients of variation (CV).

resultsThe mean difference in visceral adipose tissue volume between manual and elliptical delineation methods was -0.54 ± 4.81%. In the phantom, our measurement differed from the known adipose volume by ≤ 7.5% for all scanning parameters. Mean inter-observer CV for visceral adipose tissue volume was 0.085, and mean intra-observer CV for visceral adipose tissue volume was 0.059.

conclusionsWe have developed and validated a robust method of accurately and quickly determining visceral adipose tissue volume in any defined region of interest using CT imaging.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntra-Abdominal FatMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPhantoms, ImagingSoftwareSubcutaneous FatTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28859115
PMCPMC5578607
OpenAlexW2750845740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.