Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28859087›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Community effectiveness of indoor spraying as a dengue vector control method: A systematic review.

Moody Samuel, Dorit Maoz, Pablo Manrique, Tara Ward, Silvia Runge-Ranzinger, Joao Toledo, Ross Boyce, Olaf Horstick

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Safety Experience of TAK-003 for Dengue Fever: A New Tetravalent Live Attenuated Vaccine Candidate.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Acceptability of Integrated Vector Management ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evidence map of strategies for preventing and controllingRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. House-Level Risk Factors forJournal of tropical medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Dengue: A Minireview.Viruses · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moody SamuelInstitute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dorit MaozPublic Health Consultant, Muenchen, Germany.
Pablo ManriqueUniversidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Tara WardPublic Health Consultant, Accra, Ghana.
Silvia Runge-RanzingerPublic Health Consultant, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Joao ToledoMinistry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
Ross BoyceDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Olaf HorstickInstitute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-5686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevention and control of dengue rely mainly on vector control methods, including indoor residual spraying (IRS) and indoor space spraying (ISS). This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on community effectiveness of indoor spraying.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science, WHOLIS, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) and a manual search of the reference lists of the identified studies. Data from included studies were extracted, analysed and reported.

resultsThe review generated seven studies only, three IRS and four ISS (two/three controlled studies respectively). Two IRS studies measuring human transmission showed a decline. One IRS and all four ISS studies measuring adult mosquitoes showed a very good effect, up to 100%, but not sustained. Two IRS studies and one ISS measuring immature mosquitoes, showed mixed results.

conclusionsIt is evident that IRS and also ISS are effective adulticidal interventions against Aedes mosquitoes. However, evidence to suggest effectiveness of IRS as a larvicidal intervention and to reduce human dengue cases is limited-and even more so for ISS. Overall, there is a paucity of studies available on these two interventions that may be promising for dengue vector control, particularly for IRS with its residual effect.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationInsecticidesInsect VectorsAnimalsCulicidaeDengueHumansMosquito ControlInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID28859087
PMCPMC5578493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.