Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28859055›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Separase is a marker for prognosis and mitotic activity in breast cancer.

Natalia Gurvits, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Marjukka Nykänen, Teijo Kuopio, Pauliina Kronqvist, Kati Talvinen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of chromosomal cohesion and separation in aneuploidy and tumorigenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The molecular mechanisms of human separase regulation.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Review
  6. Separase and Roads to Disengage Sister Chromatids during Anaphase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CD8Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia GurvitsInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku 20510, Finland.
Eliisa LöyttyniemiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, Turku 20510, Finland.
Marjukka NykänenDepartment of Pathology, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Keskussairaalantie 19, Jyväskylä 40620, Finland.
Teijo KuopioBiological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä and Department of Pathology, Central Finland Health Care District, Keskussairaalantie 19, Jyväskylä 40620, Finland.
Pauliina KronqvistInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku 20510, Finland.
Kati TalvinenInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku 20510, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cell proliferation is a critical feature in classifying and predicting the outcome of breast carcinoma. Separase has a central role in cell cycle progression in unleashing sister-chromatids at anaphase onset. Abnormally functioning separase is known to lead to chromosomal instability.

methodsThe study comprises 349 breast carcinoma patients treated in Central Hospital of Central Finland. The prognostic value, role as a proliferation marker and regulatory interactions of separase are evaluated by immunohistochemical and double- and triple-immunofluorescence (IF) detections based on complete clinical data and >22-year follow-up of the patient material.

resultsIn our material, abnormal separase expression predicted doubled risk of breast cancer death (P<0.001). Up to 11.3-year survival difference was observed when comparing patients with and without separase expressing cancer cell mitoses. Particularly, abnormal separase expression predicted impaired survival for luminal breast carcinoma (P<0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses, abnormal separase expression showed independent prognostic value. The complex inhibitory interactions involving securin and cyclin B1 were investigated in double- and triple-IFs and revealed patient subgroups with aberrant regulation and expression patterns of separase.

conclusionsIn our experience, separase is a promising and clinically applicable proliferation marker. Separase expression shows strong and independent prognostic value and could be developed into a biomarker for treatment decisions in breast carcinoma, particularly defining prognostic subgroups among luminal carcinomas.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMitosisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSecurinSeparaseSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorSecurinSeparase

Identifiers

PMID28859055
PMCPMC5672940
OpenAlexW2752266962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.