Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858695›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Interest in and reactions to genetic risk information: The role of implicit theories and self-affirmation.

Jennifer M Taber, William M P Klein, Susan Persky, Rebecca A Ferrer, Annette R Kaufman, Chan L Thai, Peter R Harris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Physical health mindsets and information avoidance.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M TaberNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States. Electronic address: jtaber1@kent.edu.
William M P KleinNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Susan PerskyNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Rebecca A FerrerNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Annette R KaufmanNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Chan L ThaiNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Peter R HarrisSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleImplicit theories reflect core assumptions about whether human attributes are malleable or fixed: Incremental theorists believe a characteristic is malleable whereas entity theorists believe it is fixed. People with entity theories about health may be less likely to engage in risk-mitigating behavior. Spontaneous self-affirmation (e.g., reflecting on one's values when threatened) may lessen defensiveness and unhealthy behaviors associated with fixed beliefs, and reduce the likelihood of responding to health risk information with fixed beliefs.

methodAcross two studies conducted in the US from 2012 to 2015, we investigated how self-affirmation and implicit theories about health and body weight were linked to engagement with genetic risk information. In Study 1, participants in a genome sequencing trial (n = 511) completed cross-sectional assessments of implicit theories, self-affirmation, and intentions to learn, share, and use genetic information. In Study 2, overweight women (n = 197) were randomized to receive genetic or behavioral explanations for weight; participants completed surveys assessing implicit theories, self-affirmation, self-efficacy, motivation, and intentions.

resultsFixed beliefs about weight were infrequently endorsed across studies (10.8-15.2%). In Study 1, participants with stronger fixed theories were less interested in learning and using genetic risk information about medically actionable disease; these associations were weaker among participants higher in self-affirmation. In Study 2, among participants given behavioral explanations for weight, stronger fixed theories about weight were associated with lower motivation and intentions to eat a healthy diet. Among participants given genetic explanations, being higher in self-affirmation was associated with less fixed beliefs.

conclusionStronger health-related fixed theories may decrease the likelihood of benefiting from genetic information, but less so for people who self-affirm.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAgedBody WeightFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedMotivationRisk AssessmentUnited StatesBody weightGenetic testingImplicit theoriesLay theoriesMindsetsRiskSelf-affirmationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28858695
PMCPMC9318351
OpenAlexW2746325678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.