Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858621›Full record

ArticleNeuron2017

Specialized Representations of Value in the Orbital and Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Desirability versus Availability of Outcomes.

Peter H Rudebeck, Richard C Saunders, Dawn A Lundgren, Elisabeth A Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Orbitofrontal Cortex Underlies Consolidation of Pavlovian Anticipatory Arousal Responses in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter H RudebeckFriedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10014, USA. Electronic address: peter.rudebeck@mssm.edu.
Richard C SaundersSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Dawn A LundgrenSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Elisabeth A MurraySection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: murraye@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Neural Substrates of Reward Processing and EmotionZIAMH002887 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MURRAY, ELISABETH A · 2009 to 2025
$26.0M
A new approach to the role of prefrontal-limbic circuits in anxiety disordersR01MH110822 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUDEBECK, PETER · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002887NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advantageous foraging choices benefit from an estimation of two aspects of a resource's value: its current desirability and availability. Both orbitofrontal and ventrolateral prefrontal areas contribute to updating these valuations, but their precise roles remain unclear. To explore their specializations, we trained macaque monkeys on two tasks: one required updating representations of a predicted outcome's desirability, as adjusted by selective satiation, and the other required updating representations of an outcome's availability, as indexed by its probability. We evaluated performance on both tasks in three groups of monkeys: unoperated controls and those with selective, fiber-sparing lesions of either the OFC or VLPFC. Representations that depend on the VLPFC but not the OFC play a necessary role in choices based on outcome availability; in contrast, representations that depend on the OFC but not the VLPFC play a necessary role in choices based on outcome desirability.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleIbotenic AcidMacaca mulattaMalePrefrontal CortexReversal LearningRewardIbotenic Aciddecision-makinglearningmacaqueorbitofrontalprefrontal cortexrewardventrolateral

Identifiers

PMID28858621
PMCPMC5600902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.