Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858566›Full record

ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2018

A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.

Mourad Tighiouart, Galen Cook-Wiens, André Rogatko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mourad Tighiouarta Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Galen Cook-Wiensa Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
André Rogatkoa Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Biology and TargetingP01CA098912 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ZAYZAFOON, MAJD · 2003 to 2019
$24.0M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
Design of Cancer Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Drug Combinations of Cytotoxic and Biologic AgentsR01CA188480 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098912NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188480NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a Bayesian adaptive design for dose finding in cancer phase I clinical trials. The goal is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after possible modification of the dose range during the trial. Parametric models are used to describe the relationship between the dose and the probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). We investigate model reparameterization in terms of the probabilities of DLT at the minimum and maximum available doses at the start of the trial. Trial design proceeds using escalation with overdose control (EWOC), where at each stage of the trial we seek the dose of the agent such that the posterior probability of exceeding the MTD of this agent is bounded by a feasibility bound. At any time during the trial, we test whether the MTD is below or above the minimum and maximum doses, respectively. If during the trial there is evidence that the MTD is outside the range of doses, we extend the range of doses and complete the trial with the planned sample size. At the end of the trial, a Bayes estimate of the MTD is proposed. We evaluate design operating characteristics in terms of safety of the trial design and efficiency of the MTD estimate under various scenarios and model misspecification. The methodology is further compared to the original EWOC design. We showed by comprehensive simulation studies that the proposed method is safe and can estimate the MTD more efficiently than the original EWOC design.

Indexed as

Maximum Tolerated DoseAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCancer phase I trialsdose-limiting toxicityescalation with overdose controlflexible dose rangemaximum tolerated dose

Identifiers

PMID28858566
PMCPMC5832533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.