ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2018
A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.
Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose Finding in Oncology Trials Guided by Ordinal Toxicity Grades Using Continuous Dose Levels.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- MC-Keyboard: A Practical Phase I Trial Design for Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies Integrating Multiple-Grade Toxicities.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2024Article
- Combination L-Glutamine with Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel in Treatment-Naïve Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The Phase I GlutaPanc Study Protocol.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Modeling synergism in early phase cancer trials with drug combination with continuous dose levels: is there an added value?Brazilian journal of biometrics · 2022Article
- Phase I trial of Bermekimab with nanoliposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Mathematical Modelling for Optimal Vaccine Dose Finding: Maximising Efficacy and Minimising Toxicity.Vaccines · 2022Article
- A nonparametric Bayesian method for dose finding in drug combinations cancer trials.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- A Bayesian Adaptive Design in Cancer Phase I Trials Using Dose Combinations with Ordinal Toxicity Grades.Stats · 2020Article
- A phase I study of sirolimus in combination with metronomic therapy (CHOAnome) in children with recurrent or refractory solid and brain tumors.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2020Article
- Dose Finding for Drug Combination in Early Cancer Phase I Trials using Conditional Continual Reassessment Method.Journal of biometrics & biostatistics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a Bayesian adaptive design for dose finding in cancer phase I clinical trials. The goal is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after possible modification of the dose range during the trial. Parametric models are used to describe the relationship between the dose and the probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). We investigate model reparameterization in terms of the probabilities of DLT at the minimum and maximum available doses at the start of the trial. Trial design proceeds using escalation with overdose control (EWOC), where at each stage of the trial we seek the dose of the agent such that the posterior probability of exceeding the MTD of this agent is bounded by a feasibility bound. At any time during the trial, we test whether the MTD is below or above the minimum and maximum doses, respectively. If during the trial there is evidence that the MTD is outside the range of doses, we extend the range of doses and complete the trial with the planned sample size. At the end of the trial, a Bayes estimate of the MTD is proposed. We evaluate design operating characteristics in terms of safety of the trial design and efficiency of the MTD estimate under various scenarios and model misspecification. The methodology is further compared to the original EWOC design. We showed by comprehensive simulation studies that the proposed method is safe and can estimate the MTD more efficiently than the original EWOC design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.