ArticleRadiology2018
Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue: Noninvasive Quantitative Assessment of Characteristics with Software-aided Measurements from Conventional CT Angiography.
Article in Radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a reliable and fully automated analysis of computed tomography coronary angiography: an unmet need.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- IgG4-Related Disease Presenting With Diffuse Coronary Atherosclerosis Characterized by Marked Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core Burden.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Data-driven atherosclerotic plaque profiles from QAngio-CT associated with functional impairments assessed with PET-CT.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Vasculitis: A Nightmare Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Focused Review for the Clinical Cardiologists.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Interleukin-6 is associated with high-risk plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic women.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Development of a nomogram model using the dual-energy computed tomography angiography parameters of carotid plaque, the vascular lumen, and perivascular fat to predict acute stroke events.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- AI-Based Automated Quantification of Arterial Stenosis in Head and Neck CT Angiography: A Comparison with Manual Measurements from Digital Subtraction Angiography and CT Angiography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Observational
- Association of pericoronary inflammation with atherosclerotic plaque progression in diabetic patients with improved modifiable cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal CCTA cohort study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Use of AI in Cardiac CT and MRI: A Scientific Statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA.Radiology · 2025Review
- Quantification of carotid artery plaque and peri-vascular adipose tissue attenuation on computed tomography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Atherosclerotic plaque instability in symptomatic non-significant carotid stenoses.JVS-vascular science · 2025Article
- Carotid artery calcium score: Definition, classification, application, and limits.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden Assessment by Computed Tomography and Its Clinical Implications.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Longitudinal assessment of coronary plaque regression related to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor using coronary computed tomography angiography.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Observational
- Application of Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Atherosclerosis evaluation and cardiovascular risk estimation using coronary computed tomography angiography.European heart journal · 2024Review
- Development of physiologically-informed computational coronary artery plaques for use in virtual imaging trials.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Influencing factors and improvement methods of coronary artery plaque evaluation in CT.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To (a) evaluate whether plaque tissue characteristics determined with conventional computed tomographic (CT) angiography could be quantitated at higher levels of accuracy by using image processing algorithms that take characteristics of the image formation process coupled with biologic insights on tissue distributions into account by comparing in vivo results and ex vivo histologic findings and (b) assess reader variability. Materials and Methods Thirty-one consecutive patients aged 43-85 years (average age, 64 years) known to have or suspected of having atherosclerosis who underwent CT angiography and were referred for endarterectomy were enrolled. Surgical specimens were evaluated with histopathologic examination to serve as standard of reference. Two readers used lumen boundary to determine scanner blur and then optimized component densities and subvoxel boundaries to best fit the observed image by using semiautomatic software. The accuracy of the resulting in vivo quantitation of calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), and matrix was assessed with statistical estimates of bias and linearity relative to ex vivo histologic findings. Reader variability was assessed with statistical estimates of repeatability and reproducibility. Results A total of 239 cross sections obtained with CT angiography and histologic examination were matched. Performance on held-out data showed low levels of bias and high Pearson correlation coefficients for calcification (-0.096 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.