Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858562›Full record

ArticleRadiology2018

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet.

Karrin Weisenthal, Priyadarshini Karthik, Melissa Shaw, Debapriya Sengupta, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Judy Burleson, Adel Mustafa, Mannudeep Kalra, Christopher Moore

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. [Imaging in nephroureterolithasis].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emergency department non-contrast computed tomography for suspicion of obstructive urolithiasis: Yield and consequences.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Audit on Compliance to Guidelines in CT Scanning for Urolithiasis.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karrin WeisenthalFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Priyadarshini KarthikFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Melissa ShawFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Debapriya SenguptaFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Mythreyi Bhargavan-ChatfieldFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Judy BurlesonFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Adel MustafaFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Mannudeep KalraFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).
Christopher MooreFrom the Departments of Emergency Medicine, (K.W., M.S., C.M.) and Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 273, New Haven, CT 06510; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (P.K., D.S., M.B.C., J.B.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.K.).

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35DK104689 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD G CANTLEY, Sarwat I Chaudhry · 2015 to 2026
$2.6M
Minimizing Unnecessary Irradiation from Renal Colic CT Scans in the United StatesR18HS023778 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, CHRISTOPHER L · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023778NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK104689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To determine if the use of reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of kidney stones increased in 2015-2016 compared with that in 2011-2012, to determine variability in radiation exposure according to facility for this indication, and to establish a current average radiation dose for CT evaluation for kidney stones by querying a national dose registry. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted from July 2015 to June 2016. Study descriptors consistent with single-phase unenhanced CT for evaluation of kidney stones and associated RadLex® Playbook identifiers (RPIDs) were retrospectively identified. Facilities actively submitting data on kidney stone-specific CT examinations were included. Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate, when available, were reported, and a random effects model was run to account for clustering of CT examinations at facilities. A z-ratio was calculated to test for a significant difference between the proportion of reduced-radiation dose CT examinations (defined as those with a dose-length product of 200 mGy · cm or less) performed in 2015-2016 and the proportion performed in 2011-2012. Results Three hundred four study descriptors for kidney stone CT corresponding to data from 328 facilities that submitted 105 334 kidney stone CT examinations were identified. Reduced-dose CT examinations accounted for 8040 of 105 334 (7.6%) CT examinations, a 5.6% increase from the 1010 of 49 903 (2%) examinations in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Mean overall dose-length product was 689 mGy · cm (95% confidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy · cm observed in 2011-2012. Median facility dose-length product varied up to sevenfold, from less than 200 mGy · cm to greater than 1600 mGy · cm. Conclusion Use of reduced-radiation dose CT for evaluation of kidney stones has increased since 2011-2012, but remains low; variability of radiation dose according to facility continues to be wide. National mean CT radiation exposure for evaluation of renal colic during 2015-2016 decreased relative to 2011-2012 values, but remained well above what is reasonably achievable.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMaleRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28858562
PMCPMC5791338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.