Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858207›Full record

ArticleGenes2017

X Chromosome Evolution in Cetartiodactyla.

Anastasia A Proskuryakova, Anastasia I Kulemzina, Polina L Perelman, Alexey I Makunin, Denis M Larkin, Marta Farré, Anna V Kukekova, Jennifer Lynn Johnson, Natalya A Lemskaya, Violetta R Beklemisheva and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neo-X-Linked Chromosome Polymorphism: Cytogenetic Insights fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Revalidation ofZooKeys · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Anchoring the CerEla1.0 Genome Assembly to Red Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Anastasia A ProskuryakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. andrena@mcb.nsc.ru.
Anastasia I KulemzinaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. zakal@mcb.nsc.ru.
Polina L PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. polina.perelman@gmail.com.
Alexey I MakuninInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. alex.makunin@gmail.com.
Denis M LarkinThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK. dmlarkin@gmail.com.
Marta FarréThe Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK. mfarrebelmonte@gmail.com.
Anna V KukekovaAnimal Sciences Department, College of ACES, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA. avk@illinois.edu.
Jennifer Lynn JohnsonAnimal Sciences Department, College of ACES, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA. jjohnso@illinois.edu.
Natalya A LemskayaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. lemnat@mcb.nsc.ru.
Violetta R BeklemishevaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. bekl@mcb.nsc.ru.
Melody E Roelke-ParkerFrederick National Laboratory of Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD 21702, USA. melodyr@mail.nih.gov.
June BellizziCatoctin Zoo and Wildlife Preserve, Thurmont, MD 21788, USA. rapunta@yahoo.com.
Oliver A RyderSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027, USA. oryder@sandiegozoo.org.
Stephen J O'BrienTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Sredniy Av. 41A, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia. lgdchief@gmail.com.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. graf@mcb.nsc.ru.
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of London · GBLeidos (United States) · USSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of a remarkable conservation of the X chromosome in eutherian mammals has been first described by Susumu Ohno in 1964. A notable exception is the cetartiodactyl X chromosome, which varies widely in morphology and G-banding pattern between species. It is hypothesized that this sex chromosome has undergone multiple rearrangements that changed the centromere position and the order of syntenic segments over the last 80 million years of Cetartiodactyla speciation. To investigate its evolution we have selected 26 evolutionarily conserved bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from the cattle CHORI-240 library evenly distributed along the cattle X chromosome. High-resolution BAC maps of the X chromosome on a representative range of cetartiodactyl species from different branches: pig (Suidae), alpaca (Camelidae), gray whale (Cetacea), hippopotamus (Hippopotamidae), Java mouse-deer (Tragulidae), pronghorn (Antilocapridae), Siberian musk deer (Moschidae), and giraffe (Giraffidae) were obtained by fluorescent in situ hybridization. To trace the X chromosome evolution during fast radiation in specious families, we performed mapping in several cervids (moose, Siberian roe deer, fallow deer, and Pere David's deer) and bovid (muskox, goat, sheep, sable antelope, and cattle) species. We have identified three major conserved synteny blocks and rearrangements in different cetartiodactyl lineages and found that the recently described phenomenon of the evolutionary new centromere emergence has taken place in the X chromosome evolution of Cetartiodactyla at least five times. We propose the structure of the putative ancestral cetartiodactyl X chromosome by reconstructing the order of syntenic segments and centromere position for key groups.

Indexed as

cattle bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clonescentromere repositionfluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)intrachromosomal rearrangementsinversionPecoraRuminantia

Identifiers

PMID28858207
PMCPMC5615350
OpenAlexW2752039568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.