Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28858149›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Conducting Clinically Based Intimate Partner Violence Research: Safety Protocol Recommendations.

Jocelyn C Anderson, Nancy E Glass, Jacquelyn C Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nursing research on intimate partner violence in China: A scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jocelyn C AndersonJocelyn C. Anderson, PhD, RN, is Postdoctoral Scholar, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. Nancy E. Glass, PhD, MPH, RN, is Professor; and Jacquelyn C. Campbell, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Anna D. Wolf Chair and Professor, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nancy E Glass
Jacquelyn C Campbell

Funding

Adolescent Research in Community Postdoctoral Training ProgramT32HD087162 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MILLER, ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
Effects of Partner Violence and Mental Health on HIV Disease Progression in WomenF31MH100995 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, JOCELYN CHRISTINE · 2013 to 2015
$128k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD087162NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining safety is of utmost importance during research involving participants who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). Limited guidance on safety protocols to protect participants is available, particularly information related to technology-based approaches to informed consent, data collection, and contacting participants during the course of a study. PURPOSE: The purpose of the article is to provide details on the safety protocol developed and utilized with women receiving care at an urban HIV clinic and who were taking part in an observational study of IPV, mental health symptoms, and substance abuse and their relationship to HIV treatment adherence. The protocol presents the technological strategies to promote safety and allow autonomy in participant decision-making throughout the research process, including Voice over Internet Protocol telephone numbers, and tablet-based eligibility screening and data collection. Protocols for management of participants at risk for suicide and/or intimate partner homicide that included automated high-risk messaging to participants and research staff and facilitated disclosure of risk to clinical staff based on participant preferences are discussed. DISCUSSION: Use of technology and partnership with clinic staff helped to provide an environment where research regarding IPV could be conducted without undue burden or risk to participants. Utilizing tablet-based survey administration provided multiple practical and safety benefits for participants. Most women who screened into high-risk categories for suicide or intimate partner homicide did not choose to have their results shared with their healthcare providers, indicating the importance of allowing participants control over information sharing whenever possible.

Indexed as

AdultData CollectionFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationSafety ManagementSpouse Abuse

Identifiers

PMID28858149
PMCPMC5656401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.