ArticleMedicine2017
Surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma with Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt: Case report.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Neovascular Glaucoma: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Comparison between the Express Implant and Transscleral Diode Laser in Neovascular Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Changes in the Density of Corneal Endothelial Cells in Elderly Diabetic Patients After Combined Phacovitrectomy and Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Implants.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2019Article
- Pars plana insertion of glaucoma shunt in eyes with refractory neovascular glaucoma: Case report.Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleNeovascular glaucoma (NVG) is one of the most aggressive types of glaucoma, and its abnormal fibrovascular tissue growth on the iris and trabecular meshwork may create difficulties to control the intraocular pressure (IOP) and perform the operation such as trabeculectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt has been introduced to serve as one alternative operation for glaucoma, and is thought to have the potential advantage of being less traumatic than traditional trabeculectomy. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary Ex-PRESS implantation in eyes with NVG. DIAGNOSES AND
interventionsThis was a retrospective study of four patients with NVG in whom primary Ex-PRESS implantation was performed between January 2012 and October 2016. OUTCOMES: After a mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 8.9 months (range, 15-34 months), three of four NVG patients (75.0%) receiving primary Ex-PRESS implantation had postoperative IOP under 21 mmHg without any antiglaucoma medication control at the last follow-up, but shunt reposition had been performed due to failed blebs or recurrent NVG. Besides, the best corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up was stabilized or improved in three of four NVG patients (75.0%), accompanied with the regression of iris neovascularization. Only one patient had self-resolved postoperative hyphema; otherwise, there were no other perioperative complications. LESSONS: Primary Ex-PRESS implantation might constitute a safe and alternative treatment for patients with NVG. In spite of the possible reoperations, the final outcomes were still shown effective after shunt reposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.