ArticleMelanoma research2017
Putative genomic characteristics of BRAF V600K versus V600E cutaneous melanoma.
Article in Melanoma research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review.International journal of cancer · 2020Pooled it
- BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies.Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2022Trial
- Non-coding RNAs in BRAF-mutant melanoma: targets, indicators, and therapeutic potential.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Activation mechanisms of clinically distinct B-Raf V600E and V600K mutants.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2023Article
- Discovery of New Quinolone-Based Diarylamides as Potent B-RAFInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Current Controversies and Challenges on BRAF V600K-Mutant Cutaneous Melanoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The Genetics of Early-Stage Melanoma in a Veteran Population.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Characterization and Clinical Utility ofCancers · 2021Article
- BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Ultrasound-Mediated Microbubble Destruction Inhibits Skin Melanoma Growth by Affecting YAP1 Translation Using Ribosome Imprinting Sequencing.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Cutaneous Melanoma Classification: The Importance of High-Throughput Genomic Technologies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Interacting Genetic Lesions of Melanoma in the Tumor Microenvironment: Defining a Viable Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Increased Expression of T-Box Transcription Factor Protein 21 (TBX21) in Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Predicts Better Prognosis: A Study Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Databases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Optimal treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients harboringTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 50% of all cutaneous melanomas harbor activating BRAF V600 mutations; among, these 10-30% carry the V600K mutation. Clinically, patients with V600K tumors experience distant metastases sooner and have an increased risk of relapse and shorter survival than patients with V600E tumors. Despite the clinical and other histopathological differences between these BRAF tumor subtypes, little is known about them at the genomic level. Herein, we systematically compared BRAF V600E and V600K skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for differential protein, gene, and microRNA expression genome-wide using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Our analyses showed that elements of energy-metabolism and protein-translation pathways were upregulated and that proapoptotic pathways were downregulated in V600K tumors compared with V600E tumors. We found that c-Kit protein and KIT gene expressions were significantly higher in V600K tumors than in V600E tumors, concurrent with significant downregulation of several KIT-targeting microRNAs (mir) including mir-222 in V600K tumors, suggesting KIT and mir-222 might be key genomic contributors toward the clinical differences observed. The relationship that we uncovered among KIT/c-Kit expression, mir-222 expression, and growth and prosurvival signals in V600 tumors is intriguing. We believe that the observed clinical aggressiveness of V600K tumors compared to V600E tumors may be attributable to the increased energy metabolism, protein translation and prosurvival signals compared with V600E tumors. If confirmed using larger numbers of V600K tumors, our results may prove useful for designing clinical management and targeted chemotherapeutical interventions for BRAF V600K-positive melanomas. Finally, the small sample size in V600K tumors is a major limitation of our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.