ReviewBioengineered2018
Specificity of peptidases secreted by filamentous fungi.
Review in Bioengineered, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of draft genome assemblies developed from whole genome sequences of twoBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Peptides: Molecular and Biotechnological Aspects.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Effects of Simulated Microgravity on the Proteome and Secretome of the Polyextremotolerant Black FungusFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Disruption of a C69-Family Cysteine Dipeptidase Gene Enhances Heat Shock and UV-B Tolerances inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- A comprehensive review on fungal endophytes and its dynamics on Orchidaceae plants: current research, challenges, and future possibilities.Bioengineered · 2019Review
- A review of plant leaf fungal diseases and its environment speciation.Bioengineered · 2019Review
- Proteolytic analysis of Trichoderma reesei in celluase-inducing condition reveals a role for trichodermapepsin (TrAsP) in cellulase production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptidases are enzymes that cleave peptide bonds, yielding proteins and peptides. Enzymes in this class also perform several other functions, regulating the activation or inactivation of target substrates via proteolysis. Owing to these functions, peptidases have been extensively used in industrial and biotechnological applications. Given their potential functions, it is important to optimize the use of these enzymes, which requires determination of the specificity of each peptidase. The peptidase specificity must be taken into account in choosing a peptidase to catalyze the available protein source within the desired application. The specificity of a peptidase defines the profile of enzyme-substrate interactions, and for this the catalytic site and the arrangement of the amino acid residues involved in peptide bond cleavage need to be known. The catalytic sites of peptidases may be composed of several subsites that interact with amino acid residues for proteolysis. Filamentous fungi produce peptidases with varying specificity, and here we provide a review of those reported to date and their potential applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.