Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28857520›Full record

Trial reportCroatian medical journal2017

A combination of levobupivacaine and lidocaine for paravertebral block in breast cancer patients undergoing quadrantectomy causes greater hemodynamic oscillations than levobupivacaine alone.

Miroslav Župčić, Sandra Graf Župčić, Viktor Duzel, Tatjana Šimurina, Livija Šakić, Jurica Fudurić, Jasminka Peršec, Milan Milošević, Zdenko Stanec, Anđelko Korušić and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Croatian medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03868917 (Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Approach and Ultrasound-guided Approach Combined With Pressure Measurement Technique to Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Open Thoracotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03868917 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Approach and Ultrasound-guided Approach Combined With Pressure Measurement Technique to Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Open Thoracotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorYeungnam University College of MedicineRan2019 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsThoracotomyArmsthoracic paravertebral block using pressure measurement technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Miroslav ŽupčićMiroslav Župčić, Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Av. G. Šuška 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, miro_zupcic@yahoo.com.
Sandra Graf Župčić
Viktor Duzel
Tatjana Šimurina
Livija Šakić
Jurica Fudurić
Jasminka Peršec
Milan Milošević
Zdenko Stanec
Anđelko Korušić
Stjepan Barišin
University Hospital Dubrava · HRUniversity of Osijek · HRAndrija Stampar Teaching Institute of Public Health · HRBarking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBKarlovac University of Applied Sciences · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo test for differences in hemodynamic and analgesic properties in patients with breast cancer undergoing quadrantectomy with paravertebral block (PVB) induced with a solution of either one or two local anesthetics.

methodA prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial was conducted from June 2014 until September 2015. A total of 85 women with breast cancer were assigned to receive PVB with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n=42) or 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine (n=43). Hemodynamic variables of interest included intraoperative stroke volume variation (SVV), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, episodes of hypotension, use of crystalloids, and use of inotropes. Analgesic variables of interest were time to block onset, duration of analgesia, and postoperative serial pain assessment using a visual analogue scale.

resultsAlthough the use of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine solution for PVB decreased the mean time-to-block onset (14 minutes; P<0.001), it also caused significantly higher SVV values over the 60 minutes of monitoring (mean difference: 4.33; P<0.001). Furthermore, the patients who received 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine experienced shorter mean duration of analgesia (105 minutes; P=0.006) and more episodes of hypotension (17.5%; P=0.048) and received more intraoperative crystalloids (mean volume: 550 mL; P<0.001).

conclusionThe use of 0.5% levobupivacaine in comparison with 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine solution for PVB had a longer time-to-block onset, but it also reduced hemodynamic disturbances and prolonged the analgesic effect.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineAgedAnalgesiaBreast NeoplasmsBupivacaineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansLevobupivacaineMiddle AgedNerve BlockPain MeasurementAnesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLevobupivacaineLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID28857520
PMCPMC5577647
OpenAlexW2752059248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.