Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28857373›Full record

Trial reportMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2017

Effect of direct cold atmospheric plasma (diCAP) on microcirculation of intact skin in a controlled mechanical environment.

Thomas Borchardt, Jennifer Ernst, Andreas Helmke, Murat Tanyeli, Arndt F Schilling, Gunther Felmerer, Wolfgang Viöl

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Penetration depth of cold atmospheric plasma into biological tissue: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas BorchardtDepartment of Sciences and Technology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-9345
Jennifer ErnstDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Andreas HelmkeApplication Center for Plasma and Photonic, Fraunhofer Institute for Surface Engineering and Thin Films IST, Goettingen, Germany.
Murat TanyeliDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Arndt F SchillingDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Gunther FelmererDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Wolfgang ViölDepartment of Sciences and Technology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe microcirculatory response of intact human skin to exposure with diCAP for different durations with a focus on the effect of implied mechanical pressure during plasma treatment was investigated.

methodsLocal relative hemoglobin, blood flow velocity, tissue oxygen saturation, and blood flow were monitored noninvasively for up to 1 hour in 1-2 mm depth by optical techniques, as well as temperature, pH values, and moisture before and after skin stimulation. The experimental protocol (N = 10) was set up to differentiate between pressure- and plasma-induced effects.

resultsSignificant increases in microcirculation were only observed after plasma stimulation but not after pressure stimulus alone. For a period of 1 h after stimulation, local relative hemoglobin was increased by 5.1% after 270 seconds diCAP treatment. Tissue oxygen saturation increased by up to 9.4%, whereas blood flow was doubled (+106%). Skin pH decreased by 0.3 after 180 seconds and 270 seconds diCAP treatment, whereas skin temperature and moisture were not affected.

conclusionsdiCAP treatment of intact skin notably enhances microcirculation for a therapeutically relevant period. This effect is specific to the plasma treatment and not an effect of the applied pressure. Prolonged treatment durations lead to more pronounced effects.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMicrocirculationOxygenPlasma GasesSkinHemoglobinsOxygenPlasma Gasesblood flowcold atmospheric plasmahemoglobinmicrocirculationplasma medicineskintissue oxygen saturationtranscutaneous oxygen pressurewound healingwounds

Identifiers

PMID28857373
PMCPMC6084368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.