Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28856974›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Experiences of using a participatory action research approach to strengthen district local capacity in Eastern Uganda.

Moses Tetui, Anna-Britt Coe, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Suzanne N Kiwanuka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moses Tetuia Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-7601
Anna-Britt Coeb Sociology Department , Umeå University 901 87 Umeå , Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-9060
Anna-Karin Hurtigc Epidemiology and Global Health Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-1467
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kirachoa Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-2068
Suzanne N Kiwanukaa Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-4897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo achieve a sustained improvement in health outcomes, the way health interventions are designed and implemented is critical. A participatory action research approach is applauded for building local capacity such as health management. Thereby increasing the chances of sustaining health interventions.

objectiveThis study explored stakeholder experiences of using PAR to implement an intervention meant to strengthen the local district capacity.

methodsThis was a qualitative study featuring 18 informant interviews and a focus group discussion. Respondents included politicians, administrators, health managers and external researchers in three rural districts of eastern Uganda where PAR was used. Qualitative content analysis was used to explore stakeholders' experiences.

results'Being awakened' emerged as an overarching category capturing stakeholder experiences of using PAR. This was described in four interrelated and sequential categories, which included: stakeholder involvement, being invigorated, the risk of wide stakeholder engagement and balancing the risk of wide stakeholder engagement. In terms of involvement, the stakeholders felt engaged, a sense of ownership, felt valued and responsible during the implementation of the project. Being invigorated meant being awakened, inspired and supported. On the other hand, risks such as conflict, stress and uncertainty were reported, and finally these risks were balanced through tolerance, risk-awareness and collaboration.

conclusionsThe PAR approach was desirable because it created opportunities for building local capacity and enhancing continuity of interventions. Stakeholders were awakened by the approach, as it made them more responsive to systems challenges and possible local solutions. Nonetheless, the use of PAR should be considered in full knowledge of the undesirable and complex experiences, such as uncertainty, conflict and stress. This will enable adequate preparation and management of stakeholder expectations to maximize the benefits of the approach.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCooperative BehaviorFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsRural Health ServicesStress, PsychologicalUgandadistrictsimplementation sciencelocal capacityMANIFEST - Maternal and Neonatal Implementation for Equitable Systems StudyParticipatory action researchstakeholders experiences

Identifiers

PMID28856974
PMCPMC5645723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.