Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28856207›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2016

A new sensitive automated assay for procalcitonin detection: LIAISON

Antonio Fortunato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of Procalcitonin Assays on KRYPTOR and LIAISONDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Antonio FortunatoLaboratorio di Chimica Clinica ed Ematologia, Ospedale "San Bortolo", Vicenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the performance of LIAISON

methodsDiagnostic performance was evaluated on: a) 193 selected samples covering the assay range, whose procalcitonin levels were already evaluated with the B·R·A·H·M·S PCT

resultsThe comparison of LIAISON

conclusionThe fully automated LIAISON

Indexed as

Antibiotic treatmentAutomated diagnostic detection methodsBacterial infectionsPCTSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28856207
PMCPMC5574861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.