Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28856076›Full record

ArticleCureus2017

Dementia Health Promotion for Chinese Americans.

Benjamin K Woo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bridging ADRD Gaps: Insights from Community-led Listening Sessions Among the Korean American Immigrants in New York.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and validation of educational multimedia to promote public health literacy about healthy cognitive aging.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Social media as an educational platform on hypertension for Chinese Americans.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin K WooUCLA.
UCLA Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction This study aims to describe the results of a dementia awareness campaign in the Chinese American community.  Methods The campaign consisted of a health fair, four dementia seminars, radio shows, television episodes, and a YouTube series. Descriptive statistics and qualitative data were obtained from various health communication channels.    Results There were 156 and 313 participants in the health fair and dementia seminars, respectively. The participants in each component of the campaign also provided qualitative data on barriers and effective ways to disseminate awareness of dementia and brain health.  Conclusion A dementia awareness campaign may be an effective way to reduce health disparities and dementia in the Chinese American community.

Indexed as

asian americanschinese americansdementiahealth literacyhealth promotionhealth servicesknowledge disseminationmedical educationyoutube

Identifiers

PMID28856076
PMCPMC5574630
OpenAlexW2730749597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.