ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Evaluation of the clinical benefits of adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer: A retrospective study.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capecitabine is orally administered and may be safely and conveniently used in patients with cancer. The antitumor activity of capecitabine in breast cancer was mostly demonstrated in the salvage therapy setting, whereas the effect of adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in breast cancer remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer. A total of 251 patients were enrolled and survival was compared between elderly breast cancer patients who received adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy and those who received no chemotherapy. Cancer-specific and disease-free survival curves were compared using log-rank tests and survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox's proportional hazard regression model. There was no significant difference between the clinicopathological characteristics, including age, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade and hormone status, between patients in the two groups. The breast cancer-specific survival rate was 89.3% in the capecitabine monotherapy group vs. 81.3% in the no chemotherapy group; the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.128). The disease-free survival rate was 81.7% in the capecitabine monotherapy group vs. 65.3% in the no chemotherapy group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a longer disease-free survival in the capecitabine monotherapy group (P=0.015). On Cox regression analysis, capecitabine monotherapy was found to be associated with the disease-free survival rate (P=0.014, hazard ratio=0.500) but not with the cancer-specific survival rate (P=0.181). The adverse events of capecitabine monotherapy were recorded and there was no chemotherapy interruption due to severe adverse reactions. Therefore, adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer is a safe and effective option, as well as a viable alternative for elderly breast cancer patients who refuse standard adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.