Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855851›Full record

ArticleBiological procedures online2017

An Assessment of Fixed and Native Chromatin Preparation Methods to Study Histone Post-Translational Modifications at a Whole Genome Scale in Skeletal Muscle Tissue.

Sarah-Anne David, Benoît Piégu, Christelle Hennequet-Antier, Maëlle Pannetier, Tiphaine Aguirre-Lavin, Sabine Crochet, Thierry Bordeau, Nathalie Couroussé, Aurélien Brionne, Yves Bigot and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological procedures online, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Premature termination codons in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah-Anne DavidURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Benoît PiéguUMR PRC, CNRS, IFCE, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Christelle Hennequet-AntierURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Maëlle PannetierUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Tiphaine Aguirre-LavinUMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Sabine CrochetURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Thierry BordeauURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Nathalie CourousséURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Aurélien BrionneURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Yves BigotUMR PRC, CNRS, IFCE, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Anne CollinURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Vincent CousthamURA, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5399-2723
Biologie des oiseaux et aviculture · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic loci associated with histone marks are typically analyzed by immunoprecipitation of the chromatin followed by quantitative-PCR (ChIP-qPCR) or high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). Chromatin can be either cross-linked (X-ChIP) or used in the native state (N-ChIP). Cross-linking of DNA and proteins helps stabilizing their interactions before analysis. Despite X-ChIP is the most commonly used method, muscle tissue fixation is known to be relatively inefficient. Moreover, no protocol described a simple and reliable preparation of skeletal muscle chromatin of sufficient quality for subsequent high-throughput sequencing. Here we aimed to set-up and compare both chromatin preparation methods for a genome-wide analysis of H3K27me3, a broad-peak histone mark, using chicken

resultsFixed and unfixed chromatin were prepared from chicken muscle tissues (

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the preparation of muscle chromatin for ChIP-seq in cross-linked conditions can compromise the systematic analysis of broad histone marks. Therefore, native chromatin preparation should be preferred to cross-linking when a ChIP experiment has to be performed on skeletal muscle tissue, particularly when a broad source signal is considered.

Indexed as

Chromatin immunoprecipitationCross-linkingEpigeneticsHistone post-translational modificationsNativeSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID28855851
PMCPMC5576305
OpenAlexW2752212623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.