ArticleSubstance abuse : research and treatment2017
Medical Decision-Making Processes and Online Behaviors Among Cannabis Dispensary Staff.
Article in Substance abuse : research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabis Dispensary Staff ("Budtender") Perspectives on Trustworthiness of Social Media Information: A Qualitative Study.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2026Article
- Dispensing Medical Advice: San Francisco Bay Area Budtender Recommendations for Pain and Sleep Relief.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2025Article
- Developing a Mock Retail Cannabis Shop for Research: A Description of The CANNEX.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2025Article
- Physicians' Attitudes and Practices Regarding Cannabis and Recommending Medical Cannabis Use.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2024Article
- Healthcare professionals' and budtenders' perceptions of perinatal cannabis use.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2022Article
- Analysis of State Cannabis Laws and Dispensary Staff Recommendations to Adults Purchasing Medical Cannabis.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- When Cannabis Use Goes Wrong: Mental Health Side Effects of Cannabis Use That Present to Emergency Services.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Comparison of Male and Female Patients in Louisiana Medical Marijuana Dispensaries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Reefer madness?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
- Attitudes about cannabis mediate the relationship between cannabis knowledge and use in active adult athletes.Journal of cannabis research · 2020Article
- Article
- Indications and administration practices amongst medical cannabis healthcare providers: a cross-sectional survey.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Priming primary care providers to engage in evidence-based discussions about cannabis with patients.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2019Review
- Recommendations From Cannabis Dispensaries About First-Trimester Cannabis Use.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Article
- Impact of Healthcare Provider Awareness and Guidance on the Medical Cannabis Experience.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost cannabis patients engage with dispensary staff, like budtenders, for medical advice on cannabis. Yet, little is known about these interactions and how the characteristics of budtenders affect these interactions. This study investigated demographics, workplace characteristics, medical decision-making, and online behaviors among a sample of budtenders.
methodsBetween June and September 2016, a cross-sectional Internet survey was administered to budtenders in the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Los Angeles. A total of 158 budtenders fully responded to the survey. A series of comparisons were conducted to determine differences between trained and untrained budtenders.
resultsAmong the 158 budtenders, 56% had received formal training to become a budtender. Several demographic differences were found between trained and untrained budtenders. For workplace characteristics, trained budtenders were more likely to report budtender as their primary job (74% vs 53%), practice more than 5 years (34% vs 11%), and receive sales commission (57% vs 16%). Trained budtenders were significantly less likely to perceive medical decision-making as very important (47% vs 68%) and have a patient-centered philosophy (77% vs 89%). Although trained budtenders had significantly lower Internet usage, they were significantly more likely to exchange information with patients through e-mail (58% vs 39%), text message (46% vs 30%), mobile app (33% vs 11%), video call (26% vs 3%), and social media (51% vs 23%).
conclusionsBudtenders who are formally trained exhibit significantly different patterns of interaction with medical cannabis patients. Future studies will use multivariate methods to better determine which factors independently influence interactions and how budtenders operate after the introduction of regulations under the newly passed Proposition 64 that permits recreational cannabis use in California.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.