Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855711›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Potential Antigens Involved in Delayed Xenograft Rejection in a Ggta1/Cmah Dko Pig-to-Monkey Model.

Junfang Zhang, Chongwei Xie, Ying Lu, Ming Zhou, Zepeng Qu, Da Yao, Chuanghua Qiu, Jia Xu, Dengke Pan, Yifan Dai and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR/Cas Technology in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Junfang ZhangShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Chongwei XieShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Ying LuShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Ming ZhouShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Zepeng QuShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Da YaoShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Chuanghua QiuShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Jia XuShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Dengke PanKey Laboratory of Farm Animal Genetic Resource and Germplasm Innovation of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yifan DaiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Hidetaka HaraXenotransplantation Program/Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-7365
David K C CooperXenotransplantation Program/Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Shanshan MaDepartment of Biochemistry, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Mingtao LiDepartment of Biochemistry, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhiming CaiShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Lisha MouShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, School of medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China. lishamou@gmail.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNShenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When hyperacute rejection is avoided by deletion of Gal expression in the pig, delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) becomes a major immunologic barrier to successful xenotransplantation. This study was to investigate the potential antigens involved in DXR. We isolated primary renal microvascular endothelial cells (RMEC) and aortic endothelial cells (AEC) from a GGTA1/CMAH double-knockout (DKO) pig (and a GGTA1-KO pig) and immunized cynomolgus monkeys with both of these cells. After sensitization, monkey serum antibody binding and cytotoxicity to RMEC was significantly higher than to AEC(p < 0.05), suggesting that RMEC are more immunogenic than AEC. Transcriptome sequencing of GGTA1/CMAH DKO pigs indicated that the expression of 1,500 genes was higher in RMEC than in AEC, while expression of 896 genes was lower. Next, we selected 101 candidate genes expressed only in pig RMEC, but not in pig AEC or in monkey or human RMEC. When these genes were knocked out individually in GGTA1/CMAH DKO RMEC, 32 genes were associated with reduced antibody binding, indicating that these genes might be primary immunologic targets involved in DXR. These genes may be important candidates for deletion in producing pigs against which there is a reduced primate immune response in pig kidney xenograft.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsAntigensCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularFemaleGalactosyltransferasesGraft RejectionHeterograftsHumansKidneyMacaca fascicularisSwinealpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase 1, porcineAntigensGalactosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID28855711
PMCPMC5577312
OpenAlexW2749722607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.