Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855686›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Novelty application of multi-omics correlation in the discrimination of sulfur-fumigation and non-sulfur-fumigation Ophiopogonis Radix.

Shengyun Dai, Zhanpeng Shang, Fei Wang, Yanfeng Cao, Xinyuan Shi, Zhaozhou Lin, Zhibin Wang, Ning Li, Jianqiu Lu, Yanjiang Qiao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shengyun DaiSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China.
Zhanpeng ShangSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China.
Fei WangSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China.
Yanfeng CaoSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China.
Xinyuan ShiSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China.
Zhaozhou LinBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100010, China.
Zhibin WangBeijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ning LiShenzhen Research Institute, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Jianqiu LuSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China. lujq@vip.sina.com.
Yanjiang QiaoSchool of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, China. yjqiao@263.net.
Jiayu ZhangBeijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. zhangjiayu0615@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapid and sensitive approach to differentiate sulfur-fumigated (SF) Ophiopogonis Radix based on Multi-Omics Correlation Analysis (MOCA) strategy was first established. It was characterized by multiple data-acquisition methods (NIR, HPLC, and UHPLC-HRMS) based metabonomics and multivariate statistical analysis methods. As a result, SF and non-sulfur fumigated (NSF) Ophiopogonis Radix samples were efficaciously discriminated. Moreover, based on the acquired HRMS data, 38 sulfur-containing discriminatory markers were eventually characterized, whose NIR absorption could be in close correlation with the discriminatory NIR wavebands (5000-5200 cm

Identifiers

PMID28855686
PMCPMC5577285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.