ArticleScientific reports2017
A model to predict the incidence of allergic rhinitis based on meteorological factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of Pollen Concentration and Meteorological Factors with Medical Condition of Allergic Rhinitis in Shenyang Area.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Increasing Prevalence of Allergic Rhinitis in China.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meteorological factors have been shown to affect the physiology, distribution, and amounts of inhaled allergens. The aim of this study was to develop a model to predict the trends for onset of allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. A total of 10,914 consecutive AR outpatients were assessed for the number of daily patient visits over a period of 4 years. Meteorological data were used to assess the relationship between meteorological factors and AR incidence by time-series data and regression analysis. Predictive models for incidence of AR were established in pollen-, dust mite- and mould-sensitive groups of patients, and the predictive performances of meteorological factors on the incidence of AR were estimated using root mean squared errors (RMSEs). The incidence of pollen-, dust mites- and mould-sensitive AR patients was significantly correlated with minimum temperature, vapour pressure, and sea-level pressure, respectively. The correlation between comprehensive meteorological parametric (CMP) and incidence of AR was higher than the correlation between the individual meteorological parameters and AR incidence. CMP had higher performance than individual meteorological parameters for predicting the incidence of AR patients. These findings suggest that the incidence of pollen-, dust mites- and mould-sensitive AR can be predicted employing models based on prevailing meteorological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.