Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855587›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Diversity of culturable aerobic denitrifying bacteria in the sediment, water and biofilms in Liangshui River of Beijing, China.

Pengyi Lv, Jinxue Luo, Xuliang Zhuang, Dongqing Zhang, Zhanbin Huang, Zhihui Bai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole genome sequence of denitrifying bacteriumMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Relationship betweenAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dominance ofRSC advances · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengyi LvSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Jinxue LuoResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
Xuliang ZhuangResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China. xlzhuang@rcees.ac.cn.
Dongqing ZhangAdvanced Environmental Biotechnology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637141, Singapore.
Zhanbin HuangSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China. zbhuang2003@163.com.
Zhihui BaiResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China. zhbai@rcees.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-527X
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChina University of Mining and Technology · CNNanyang Technological University · SGResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerobic denitrification is a process reducing the nitrate into gaseous nitrogen forms in the presence of oxygen gas, which makes the nitrification and denitrification performed simultaneously. However, little was known on the diversity of the culturable aerobic denitrifying bacteria in the surface water system. In this study, 116 strains of aerobic denitrifying bacteria were isolated from the sediment, water and biofilm samples in Liangshui River of Beijing. These bacteria were classified into 14 genera based on the 16 S rDNA, such as Pseudomonas, Rheinheimera, and Gemmobacter. The Pseudomonas sp., represented by the Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas mendocina and Pseudomonas putida, composed the major culturable aerobic denitrifiers of the river, followed by Ochrobactrum sp. and Rheinheimera sp. The PCA plot showed the unclassified Pseudomonas sp. and Rheinheimera pacifica preferred to inhabit in biofilm phase while one unclassified Ochrobactrum sp. and Pseudomonas resinovorans had higher abundance in the sediment. In the overlying water, the Pseudomonas stutzeri and Ochrobactrum rhizosphaerae were found to have higher abundance, indicating these aerobic denitrifiers had different habitat-preferable characteristics among the 3 phases of river system. The findings may help select the niche to isolate the aerobic denitrifiers and facilitate the bioaugmentation-based purification of the nitrate polluted surface water.

Indexed as

BiofilmsDenitrificationMicrobiotaBacteria, AerobicGeologic SedimentsNitrogen-Fixing BacteriaRivers

Identifiers

PMID28855587
PMCPMC5577267
OpenAlexW2749978664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.