Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855344›Full record

Trial reportOccupational and environmental medicine2018

Internet-based stress management for distressed managers: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Robert Persson Asplund, Jesper Dagöö, Ida Fjellström, Linnea Niemi, Katja Hansson, Forough Zeraati, Masha Ziuzina, Anna Geraedts, Brjánn Ljótsson, Per Carlbring and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Insomnia Interventions in the Workplace: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert Persson AsplundDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7627-1729
Jesper DagööDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ida FjellströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linnea NiemiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katja HanssonDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Forough ZeraatiDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Masha ZiuzinaDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna GeraedtsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brjánn LjótssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per CarlbringDepartment of Psychology, Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SEUppsala University · SEStockholm University · SEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a guided internet-based stress management intervention (iSMI) among distressed managers compared with a attention control group (AC) with full access to treatment-as-usual.

methodA total sample of 117 distressed managers, mainly employed in the healthcare, IT, communication and educational sector, were randomised to either iSMI (n=59) or an AC group (n=58). The iSMI consisted of eight modules including cognitive behavioural stress management and positive management techniques. Participants received a minimal and weekly guidance from a psychologist or master-level psychology student focusing on support, feedback and adherence to the intervention. Self-report data were assessed at pre, post and 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome was perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-14). The secondary outcomes included mental and work-related health outcomes.

resultsParticipants in the iSMI intervention reported significantly less symptoms of perceived stress (d=0.74, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.19) and burnout (d=0.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.37) compared with controls, at postassessment. Significant medium-to-large effect sizes were also found for depression, insomnia and job satisfaction. Long-term effects (6 months) were seen on the mental health outcomes.

conclusionThis is one of the first studies showing that iSMIs can be an effective, accessible and potentially time-effective approach of reducing stress and other mental-related and work-related health symptoms among distressed managers. Future studies are needed addressing distressed managers and the potential of indirect effects on employee stress and satisfaction at work.

Indexed as

InternetAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesPsychotherapyStress, Psychologicalburnoutintervention studiesmanagerstressstress management

Identifiers

PMID28855344
PMCPMC5800342
OpenAlexW2752655150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.