Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855291›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Effect of M-current modulation on mammalian vestibular responses to transient head motion.

Choongheon Lee, J Chris Holt, Timothy A Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Effects of Several Therapeutic Agents on Mammalian Vestibular Function: Meclizine, Diazepam, and JNJ7777120.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dopaminergic Inhibition of NaFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Activation of GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Efferent Inputs Are Required for Normal Function of Vestibular Nerve Afferents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Enhanced Activation of HCN Channels Reduces Excitability and Spike-Timing Regularity in Maturing Vestibular Afferent Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Choongheon LeeDepartment of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska; and.
J Chris HoltDepartment of Otolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, and Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Timothy A JonesDepartment of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska; and timothy.jones@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Synaptic Mechanisms of Vestibular Efferent ResponsesR01DC008981 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HOLT, JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise role and mechanisms underlying efferent modulation of peripheral vestibular afferent function are not well understood in mammals. Clarifying the details of efferent action may lead to new strategies for clinical management of debilitating disturbances in vestibular and balance function. Recent evidence in turtle indicates that efferent modulation of M-currents is likely one mechanism for modifying afferent discharge. M-currents depend in part on KCNQ potassium conductances (Kv7), which can be adjusted through efferent activation of M1, M3, and/or M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). How KCNQ channels and altered M-currents affect vestibular afferent function in vivo is unclear, and whether such a mechanism operates in mammals is unknown. In this study we used the KCNQ antagonist XE991 and the KCNQ activator retigabine in anesthetized mice to evaluate the effects of M-current modulation on peripheral vestibular responses to transient head motion. At low doses of XE991, responses were modestly enhanced, becoming larger in amplitude and shorter in latency. Higher doses of XE991 produced transient response enhancement, followed by steady-state suppression where latencies and thresholds increased and amplitudes decreased. Retigabine produced opposite effects. Auditory function was also impacted, based on results of companion auditory brain stem response testing. We propose that closure of KCNQ channels transforms vestibular afferent behavior by suppressing responses to transient high-frequency stimuli while simultaneously enhancing responses to sustained low-frequency stimulation. Our results clearly demonstrate that KCNQ channels are critical for normal mammalian vestibular function and suggest that efferent action may utilize these mechanisms to modulate the dynamic characteristics and gain of vestibular afferent responses.

Indexed as

Head MovementsAnimalsAnthracenesCarbamatesEvoked PotentialsFemaleKCNQ Potassium ChannelsMembrane Transport ModulatorsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor NeuronsPhenylenediaminesVestibule, Labyrinth10,10-bis(4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenoneAnthracenesCarbamatesezogabineKCNQ Potassium ChannelsMembrane Transport ModulatorsPhenylenediaminescalyxKCNQ channelsmammalM-currentretigabinevestibular afferentVsEPXE991

Identifiers

PMID28855291
PMCPMC5712666
OpenAlexW2751101603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.