Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855286›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Improved methods for acrylic-free implants in nonhuman primates for neuroscience research.

Jacqueline A Overton, Dylan F Cooke, Adam B Goldring, Steven A Lucero, Conor Weatherford, Gregg H Recanzone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Neural Implant Design Toolbox for Nonhuman Primates.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Association of Primate Veterinarians Cranial Implant Care for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. A MRI-Based Toolbox for Neurosurgical Planning in Nonhuman Primates.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline A OvertonCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, California; jaoverton@ucdavis.edu.
Dylan F CookeDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Adam B GoldringCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, California.
Steven A LuceroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California; and.
Conor WeatherfordCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, California.
Gregg H RecanzoneCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, California.
University of California, Davis · USSimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

Temporal and Spatial Processing in the Lateral Belt of Auditory CortexR01DC015232 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RECANZONE, GREGG HOWARD · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, head fixation devices and recording cylinders have been implanted in nonhuman primates (NHP) using dental acrylic despite several shortcomings associated with acrylic. The use of more biocompatible materials such as titanium and PEEK is becoming more prevalent in NHP research. We describe a cost-effective set of procedures that maximizes the integration of headposts and recording cylinders with the animal's tissues while reducing surgery time. Nine rhesus monkeys were implanted with titanium headposts, and one of these was also implanted with a recording chamber. In each case, a three-dimensional printed replica of the skull was created based on computerized tomography scans. The titanium feet of the headposts were shaped, and the skull thickness was measured preoperatively, reducing surgery time by up to 70%. The recording cylinder was manufactured to conform tightly to the skull, which was fastened to the skull with four screws and remained watertight for 8.5 mo. We quantified the amount of regression of the skin edge at the headpost. We found a large degree of variability in the timing and extent of skin regression that could not be explained by any single recorded factor. However, there was not a single case of bone exposure; although skin retracted from the titanium, skin also remained adhered to the skull adjacent to those regions. The headposts remained fully functional and free of complications for the experimental life of each animal, several of which are still participating in experiments more than 4 yr after implant.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsHeadImplants, ExperimentalTitaniumAnimalsBiomedical ResearchFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleNeurophysiologyBiocompatible MaterialsTitaniumbiocompatibilityimplantmonkeyneurophysiologyosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID28855286
PMCPMC5814707
OpenAlexW2751820407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.