Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28855044›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2017

Sexual Behavior in Germany.

Julia Haversath, Kathrin M Gärttner, Sören Kliem, Ilka Vasterling, Bernhard Strauss, Christoph Kröger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) needs and PrEP use in Germany among men who have sex with men.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Health, Sexual Activity, and Sexual Satisfaction.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Haversath*Prof. Strauss and Prof. Kröger share last authorship; Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Diagnostics, Technical University at Brunswick; The Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony; Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena; Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim.
Kathrin M Gärttner
Sören Kliem
Ilka Vasterling
Bernhard Strauss
Christoph Kröger
University of Hildesheim · DECzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have not been any population-based surveys in Germany to date on the frequency of various types of sexual behavior. The topic is of interdisciplinary interest, particularly with respect to the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections.

methodsWithin the context of a survey that dealt with multiple topics, information was obtained from 2524 persons about their sexual orientation, sexual practices, sexual contacts outside relationships, and contraception.

resultsMost of the participating women (82%) and men (86%) described themselves as heterosexual. Most respondents (88%) said they had engaged in vaginal intercourse at least once, and approximately half said they had engaged in oral intercourse at least once (either actively or passively). 4% of the men and 17% of the women said they had been the receptive partner in anal intercourse at least once. 5% of the respondents said they had had unprotected sexual intercourse outside their primary partnership on a single occasion, and 8% said they had done so more than once; only 2% of these persons said they always used a condom during sexual intercourse with their primary partner. Among persons reporting unprotected intercourse outside their primary partnership, 25% said they had undergone a medical examination afterward because of concern about a possible sexually transmitted infection.

conclusionAmong some groups of persons, routine sexual-medicine examinations may help contain the spread of sexually transmitted infections. One component of such examinations should be sensitive questioning about the types of sexual behavior that are associated with a high risk of infection. Information should be provided about the potential modes of transmission, including unprotected vaginal, oral, and anal intercourse outside the primary partnership.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCondomsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28855044
PMCPMC5596148
OpenAlexW2799286486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.