Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854967›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2017

Innovative dressing and securement of tunneled central venous access devices in pediatrics: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Amanda J Ullman, Tricia Kleidon, Victoria Gibson, Craig A McBride, Gabor Mihala, Marie Cooke, Claire M Rickard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04462861 (A New Securement Method for External Tunneled Central Venous Access Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04462861 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A New Securement Method for External Tunneled Central Venous Access Devices (CVAD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsCentral Venous Catheter Exit Site Infection, Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream InfectionArmsCentral venous access device (CVAD) Snuggie Securement Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Central venous access device-associated complication costs in paediatric cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  5. Central venous access device management for children undergoing treatment for blood disorders and cancer: a descriptive international cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda J UllmanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia. a.ullman@griffith.edu.au.
Tricia KleidonAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Victoria GibsonAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Craig A McBrideAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Gabor MihalaAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research Group, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Marie CookeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Claire M RickardSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral venous access device (CVAD) associated complications are a preventable source of patient harm, frequently resulting in morbidity and delays to vital treatment. Dressing and securement products are used to prevent infectious and mechanical complications, however current complication rates suggest customary practices are inadequate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of launching a full-scale randomized controlled efficacy trial of innovative dressing and securement products for pediatric tunneled CVAD to prevent complication and failure.

methodsAn external, pilot, four-group randomized controlled trial of standard care (bordered polyurethane dressing and suture), in comparison to integrated securement-dressing, suture-less securement device, and tissue adhesive was undertaken across two large, tertiary referral pediatric hospitals in Australia. Forty-eight pediatric participants with newly inserted tunneled CVADs were consecutively recruited. The primary outcome of study feasibility was established by elements of eligibility, recruitment, attrition, protocol adherence, missing data, parent and healthcare staff satisfaction and acceptability, and effect size estimates for CVAD failure (cessation of function prior to completion of treatment) and complication (associated bloodstream infection, thrombosis, breakage, dislodgement or occlusion). Dressing integrity, product costs and site complications were also examined.

resultsProtocol feasibility was established. CVAD failure was: 17% (2/12) integrated securement-dressing; 8% (1/13) suture-less securement device; 0% tissue adhesive (0/12); and, 0% standard care (0/11). CVAD complications were: 15% (2/13) suture-less securement device (CVAD associated bloodstream infection, and occlusion and partial dislodgement); 8% (1/12) integrated securement-dressing (partial dislodgement); 0% tissue adhesive (0/12); and, 0% standard care (0/11). One CVAD-associated bloodstream infection occurred, within the suture-less securement device group. Overall satisfaction was highest in the integrated securement-dressing (mean 8.5/10; standard deviation 1.2). Improved dressing integrity was evident in the intervention arms, with the integrated securement-dressing associated with prolonged time to first dressing change (mean days 3.5).

conclusionsImproving the security and dressing integrity of tunneled CVADs is likely to improve outcomes for pediatric patients. Further research is necessary to identify novel, effective CVAD securement to reduce complications, and provide reliable vascular access for children.

trial registrationACTRN12614000280606 ; prospectively registered on 17/03/2014.

Indexed as

AustraliaBandagesCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersChildChild, PreschoolEquipment FailureFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePilot ProjectsPolyurethanesVeinsPolyurethanesCentral venous catheterDressingEvidence-based carePediatricsRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28854967
PMCPMC5577834
OpenAlexW2750788275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.