Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854954›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

A subset of conserved mammalian long non-coding RNAs are fossils of ancestral protein-coding genes.

Hadas Hezroni, Rotem Ben-Tov Perry, Zohar Meir, Gali Housman, Yoav Lubelsky, Igor Ulitsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Genomics of Auditory Function and Disease.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  12. The Conservation of Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNAs and Their Response toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. LncRNAs in domesticated animals: from dog to livestock species.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Methodology to Study Pseudogenized lincRNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hadas HezroniDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Rotem Ben-Tov PerryDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Zohar MeirDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Gali HousmanDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Yoav LubelskyDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Igor UlitskyDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St., Rehovot, 76100, Israel. igor.ulitsky@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-6561
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a small portion of human long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) appear to be conserved outside of mammals, but the events underlying the birth of new lncRNAs in mammals remain largely unknown. One potential source is remnants of protein-coding genes that transitioned into lncRNAs.

resultsWe systematically compare lncRNA and protein-coding loci across vertebrates, and estimate that up to 5% of conserved mammalian lncRNAs are derived from lost protein-coding genes. These lncRNAs have specific characteristics, such as broader expression domains, that set them apart from other lncRNAs. Fourteen lncRNAs have sequence similarity with the loci of the contemporary homologs of the lost protein-coding genes. We propose that selection acting on enhancer sequences is mostly responsible for retention of these regions. As an example of an RNA element from a protein-coding ancestor that was retained in the lncRNA, we describe in detail a short translated ORF in the JPX lncRNA that was derived from an upstream ORF in a protein-coding gene and retains some of its functionality.

conclusionsWe estimate that ~ 55 annotated conserved human lncRNAs are derived from parts of ancestral protein-coding genes, and loss of coding potential is thus a non-negligible source of new lncRNAs. Some lncRNAs inherited regulatory elements influencing transcription and translation from their protein-coding ancestors and those elements can influence the expression breadth and functionality of these lncRNAs.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceFossilsAnimalsBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenetic CodeHumansMammalsOpen Reading FramesProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingSyntenyProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingEvolutionLong noncoding RNAsPseudogenesTranslational regulationuORFsX inactivation

Identifiers

PMID28854954
PMCPMC5577775
OpenAlexW2751145994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.