Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854689›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2017

Identification and characterization of a subtelomeric satellite DNA in Callitrichini monkeys.

Naiara Pereira Araújo, Leonardo Gomes de Lima, Guilherme Borges Dias, Gustavo Campos Silva Kuhn, Alan Lane de Melo, Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda, Roscoe Stanyon, Marta Svartman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Complete Genome for the Common Marmoset.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naiara Pereira AraújoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Leonardo Gomes de LimaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Guilherme Borges DiasUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gustavo Campos Silva KuhnUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alan Lane de MeloUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Taxonomia e Biologia de Invertebrados, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Yatiyo Yonenaga-YassudaUniversidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Citogenética de Vertebrados, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roscoe StanyonUniversity of Florence, Department of Biology, Florence, Italy.
Marta SvartmanUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRInstituto Biológico · BRUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive DNAs are abundant fast-evolving components of eukaryotic genomes, which often possess important structural and functional roles. Despite their ubiquity, repetitive DNAs are poorly studied when compared with the genic fraction of genomes. Here, we took advantage of the availability of the sequenced genome of the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus to assess its satellite DNAs (satDNAs) and their distribution in Callitrichini. After clustering analysis of all reads and comparisons by similarity, we identified a satDNA composed by 171 bp motifs, named MarmoSAT, which composes 1.09% of the C. jacchus genome. Fluorescent in situ hybridization on chromosomes of species from the genera Callithrix, Mico and Callimico showed that MarmoSAT had a subtelomeric location. In addition to the common monomeric, we found that MarmoSAT was also organized in higher-order repeats of 338 bp in Callimico goeldii. Our phylogenetic analyses showed that MarmoSAT repeats from C. jacchus lack chromosome-specific features, suggesting exchange events among subterminal regions of non-homologous chromosomes. MarmoSAT is transcribed in several tissues of C. jacchus, with the highest transcription levels in spleen, thymus and heart. The transcription profile and subtelomeric location suggest that MarmoSAT may be involved in the regulation of telomerase and modulation of telomeric chromatin.

Indexed as

DNA, SatelliteTelomereAnimalsCallitrichinaeFemaleMalePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, SatelliteheterochromatinPlatyrrhinirepetitive DNA

Identifiers

PMID28854689
PMCPMC5737874
OpenAlexW2735484684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.