Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854688›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Odorant Receptor Gene Family in Corbiculate Bees.

Philipp Brand, Santiago R Ramírez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrated Ultrastructural and Transcriptomic Analysis of the Proboscis inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recently Evolved, Stage-Specific Genes Are Enriched at Life-Stage Transitions in Flies.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp BrandDepartment for Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis.
Santiago R RamírezDepartment for Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Pacific Biosciences PacBio RS Single Molecule Real Time SequencerS10OD018174 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ROKHSAR, DANIEL SOLEYMAN · 2014 to 2014
$600k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668NIH HHS S10 OD018174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects rely on chemical information to locate food, choose mates, and detect potential predators. It has been hypothesized that adaptive changes in the olfactory system facilitated the diversification of numerous insect lineages. For instance, evolutionary changes of Odorant Receptor (OR) genes often occur in parallel with modifications in life history strategies. Corbiculate bees display a diverse array of behaviors that are controlled through olfaction, including varying degrees of social organization, and manifold associations with floral resources. Here we investigated the molecular mechanisms driving the evolution of the OR gene family in corbiculate bees in comparison to other chemosensory gene families. Our results indicate that the genomic organization of the OR gene family has remained highly conserved for ∼80 Myr, despite exhibiting major changes in repertoire size among bee lineages. Moreover, the evolution of OR genes appears to be driven mostly by lineage-specific gene duplications in few genomic regions that harbor large numbers of OR genes. A selection analysis revealed that OR genes evolve under positive selection, with the strongest signals detected in recently duplicated copies. Our results indicate that chromosomal translocations had a minimal impact on OR evolution, and instead local molecular mechanisms appear to be main drivers of OR repertoire size. Our results provide empirical support to the longstanding hypothesis that positive selection shaped the diversification of the OR gene family. Together, our results shed new light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of olfaction in insects.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBeesGene DuplicationInsect ProteinsLysophospholipidsMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantSelection, Genetic1-O-(9',10'-methanohexadecanoyl)-sn-glycero-2,3-cyclic phosphateInsect ProteinsLysophospholipidsReceptors, Odorantbirth-death processchemosensory genesgenomic architecturehoney beesodorant receptorspositive selection

Identifiers

PMID28854688
PMCPMC5597890
OpenAlexW2953133952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.