Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854611›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2017

Age Group Differences in Perceived Age Discrimination: Associations With Self-Perceptions of Aging.

Hannah L Giasson, Tara L Queen, Marina Larkina, Jacqui Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceived ageism and psychosocial outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah L GiassonDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Tara L QueenSchool of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Marina LarkinaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Jacqui SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Survey Measures of Subjective Well-being: Age, Appraisal, and Cognition EffectsR01AG040635 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMITH, JACQUI · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040635NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: From midlife onwards, age stereotypes increasingly underlie social judgments and contribute to age-based discrimination. Whereas many studies compare differences between young and older adults in reports of age discrimination or sensitivity to age stereotypes, few consider age group differences among adults over 50. We form subgroups corresponding to social age group membership (early midlife, late midlife, young old, oldest old) and examine differences in reported experiences of everyday age discrimination and associations with self-perceptions of aging. Research Design and Method: Using cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS: N = 15,071; M Age = 68, range 50-101), multivariate logistic regression was used to examine experiences of everyday discrimination attributed to age, and associations between age discrimination and self-perceptions of aging, in four age groups: early midlife, late midlife, young old, oldest old. Results: People in the early midlife group (aged 50-59) reported more experiences of unfair treatment than the older age groups but were less likely to attribute their experiences to age discrimination. After controlling for covariates, individuals in all age groups who perceived their own aging positively were less likely to report experiences of age discrimination. The magnitude of this effect, however, was greatest in the early midlife group. Discussion and Implications: Findings support proposals that midlife is a pivotal life period when individuals adjust to life events and social role transitions. Future longitudinal studies will provide further insight into whether positive self-perceptions of aging are especially important in this phase of the life course.

Indexed as

AgeismSelf ConceptAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAgeismAttitudes & Perception toward Aging/agedHealth and Retirement StudyOlder Adults

Identifiers

PMID28854611
PMCPMC5881655
OpenAlexW2739163742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.