Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854598›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

An Upper Limit on the Functional Fraction of the Human Genome.

Dan Graur

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pervasive cryptic selection in the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulatory activity is the default DNA state in eukaryotes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using evolutionary constraint to define novel candidate driver genes in medulloblastoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Accumulation and maintenance of information in evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Non-Darwinian Molecular Biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Accurate prediction ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dan GraurDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the human population to maintain a constant size from generation to generation, an increase in fertility must compensate for the reduction in the mean fitness of the population caused, among others, by deleterious mutations. The required increase in fertility due to this mutational load depends on the number of sites in the genome that are functional, the mutation rate, and the fraction of deleterious mutations among all mutations in functional regions. These dependencies and the fact that there exists a maximum tolerable replacement level fertility can be used to put an upper limit on the fraction of the human genome that can be functional. Mutational load considerations lead to the conclusion that the functional fraction within the human genome cannot exceed 25%, and is probably considerably lower.

Indexed as

FertilityGenome, HumanModels, GeneticMutation RatePopulation DynamicsGenetics, PopulationHumansSelection, Genetichuman genomejunk DNAmutational load

Identifiers

PMID28854598
PMCPMC5570035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.