Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854575›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2017

University students' perceived risk of and intention to use waterpipe tobacco.

Mary Kay Rayens, Melinda J Ickes, Karen M Butler, Amanda T Wiggins, Debra G Anderson, Ellen J Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does waterpipe smoking increase the risk ofJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Knowledge and attitudes toward cigarette and narghile smoking among previous smokers in Lebanon.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary Kay RayensUniversity of Kentucky College of Nursing, 543 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232, USA.
Melinda J IckesDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, 111 Seaton Building, Lexington, KY 40506-0219, USA.
Karen M ButlerUniversity of Kentucky College of Nursing, 423 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232, USA.
Amanda T WigginsUniversity of Kentucky College of Nursing, 501 E2 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40526-0232, USA.
Debra G AndersonUniversity of Kentucky College of Nursing, 551 CON, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40526-0232, USA.
Ellen J HahnUniversity of Kentucky College of Nursing, 2265 Harrodsburg Road, Suite 202, Lexington, KY 40504, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging tobacco product use is increasing. We evaluated factors associated with perceived risk of and intention to use waterpipe tobacco by surveying students at a large university in the southeastern U.S. (N = 667). Proportional odds modeling assessed whether demographic characteristics and social acceptability are associated with perceived risk of waterpipe tobacco use; and if these factors and perceived risk are related to intention to use waterpipe tobacco. Participants who perceived waterpipe tobacco to be more socially acceptable had lower odds of perceiving it as risky (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.68). Compared with never users, former tobacco users and current users had lower odds of perceiving waterpipe tobacco use as risky (95% CI 0.38-0.80 and 0.28-0.63, respectively). Similarly, students with greater perceived social acceptability scores had higher odds of intending to use waterpipe tobacco (95% CI 1.41-2.63), while those who perceived greater risk had lower odds of intending to use it (95% CI 0.34-0.64). Compared with never users, former users had higher odds of intending to use waterpipe tobacco (95% CI 1.42-7.21). Among those who had ever used waterpipe tobacco, 90% reported 'to socialize' as the most frequent reason for deciding to do so. Findings underscore the need for future prevention efforts.

Indexed as

IntentionRisk-TakingUniversitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSmokingSocial ParticipationSoutheastern United StatesStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco, Waterpipe

Identifiers

PMID28854575
PMCPMC5914365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.