Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854303›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2018

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Surgical Residents.

Cornelius A Thiels, Asad J Choudhry, Mohamed D Ray-Zack, Rachel A Lindor, John R Bergquist, Elizabeth B Habermann, Martin D Zielinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do Plastic Surgery Residents Get Sued? An Analysis of Malpractice Lawsuits.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Application of a Perception NeuronJournal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cornelius A ThielsDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Asad J ChoudhryDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mohamed D Ray-ZackDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rachel A LindorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John R BergquistDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Elizabeth B HabermannThe Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Martin D ZielinskiDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medical malpractice litigation against surgical residents is rarely discussed owing to assumed legal doctrine of respondeat superior, or "let the master answer." Objective: To better understand lawsuits targeting surgical trainees to prevent future litigation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Westlaw, an online legal research database containing legal records from across the United States, was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice cases involving surgical interns, residents, or fellows from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2015. Infant-related obstetric and ophthalmologic procedures were excluded. Exposures: Involvement in a medical malpractice case. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data were collected on patient demographics, case characteristics, and outcomes and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: During a 10-year period, 87 malpractice cases involving surgical trainees were identified. A total of 50 patients were female (57%), and 79 were 18 years of age or older (91%), with a median patient age of 44.5 years (interquartile range, 45-56 years). A total of 67 cases (77%) resulted in death or permanent disability. Most cases involved elective surgery (61 [70%]) and named a junior resident as a defendant (24 of 35 [69%]). Cases more often questioned the perioperative medical knowledge, decision making errors, and injuries (53 [61%]: preoperative, 19 of 53 [36%]) and postoperative, 34 of 53 [64%]) than intraoperative errors and injuries (43 [49%]). Junior residents were involved primarily with lawsuits related to medical decision making (21 of 24 [87%]). Residents' failure to evaluate the patient was cited in 10 cases (12%) and lack of direct supervision by attending physicians was cited in 48 cases (55%). A total of 42 cases (48%) resulted in a jury verdict or settlement in favor of the plaintiff, with a median payout of $900 000 (range, $1852 to $32 million). Conclusions and Relevance: This review of malpractice cases involving surgical residents highlights the importance of perioperative management, particularly among junior residents, and the importance of appropriate supervision by attending physicians as targets for education on litigation prevention.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceClinical Decision-MakingCommunicationCompensation and RedressDatabases, FactualDocumentationElective Surgical ProceduresFaculty, MedicalFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInternship and ResidencyMaleMalpracticeMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28854303
PMCPMC5833625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.