ArticleJAMA surgery2018
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Surgical Residents.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Back to the anatomy lab: a forgotten foundation or an ongoing necessity?BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Integration of robotics as standard surgical procedure during residency training for visceral surgery using a balanced scorecard (BSC).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of the causes of improper medical decision-making in medical damage liability disputes in China: a text mining approach.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Out-of-scope Cosmetic Surgery: A Review of Malpractice Lawsuits against Nonplastic Surgeons.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Do Plastic Surgery Residents Get Sued? An Analysis of Malpractice Lawsuits.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Causes and Outcomes of Medicolegal Proceedings Following Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Canada.Gastro hep advances · 2023Article
- Medical Dispute Cases Caused by Errors in Clinical Reasoning: An Investigation and Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Urology Trainees.Urology · 2022Article
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology in the USA.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Forensic Implications of Anatomical Education and Surgical Training With Cadavers.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Review
- Cholecystectomy-related malpractice litigation: predictive factors of case outcome.Updates in surgery · 2019Article
- Malpractice allegations: A reality check for resident physicians.American journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Application of a Perception NeuronJournal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Residents' Ratings of Their Clinical Supervision and Their Self-Reported Medical Errors: Analysis of Data From 2009.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018Article
- Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Anesthesiology Residents: An Analysis of the National Westlaw Database.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Medical malpractice litigation against surgical residents is rarely discussed owing to assumed legal doctrine of respondeat superior, or "let the master answer." Objective: To better understand lawsuits targeting surgical trainees to prevent future litigation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Westlaw, an online legal research database containing legal records from across the United States, was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice cases involving surgical interns, residents, or fellows from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2015. Infant-related obstetric and ophthalmologic procedures were excluded. Exposures: Involvement in a medical malpractice case. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data were collected on patient demographics, case characteristics, and outcomes and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: During a 10-year period, 87 malpractice cases involving surgical trainees were identified. A total of 50 patients were female (57%), and 79 were 18 years of age or older (91%), with a median patient age of 44.5 years (interquartile range, 45-56 years). A total of 67 cases (77%) resulted in death or permanent disability. Most cases involved elective surgery (61 [70%]) and named a junior resident as a defendant (24 of 35 [69%]). Cases more often questioned the perioperative medical knowledge, decision making errors, and injuries (53 [61%]: preoperative, 19 of 53 [36%]) and postoperative, 34 of 53 [64%]) than intraoperative errors and injuries (43 [49%]). Junior residents were involved primarily with lawsuits related to medical decision making (21 of 24 [87%]). Residents' failure to evaluate the patient was cited in 10 cases (12%) and lack of direct supervision by attending physicians was cited in 48 cases (55%). A total of 42 cases (48%) resulted in a jury verdict or settlement in favor of the plaintiff, with a median payout of $900 000 (range, $1852 to $32 million). Conclusions and Relevance: This review of malpractice cases involving surgical residents highlights the importance of perioperative management, particularly among junior residents, and the importance of appropriate supervision by attending physicians as targets for education on litigation prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.