Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28854233›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2017

Protective capacity of neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies against glycoprotein B of cytomegalovirus.

Anna Bootz, Astrid Karbach, Johannes Spindler, Barbara Kropff, Nina Reuter, Heinrich Sticht, Thomas H Winkler, William J Britt, Michael Mach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HCMV glycoprotein B subunit vaccine efficacy mediated by nonneutralizing antibody effector functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computational design of prefusion-stabilized Herpesvirus gB trimers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. An Overview of the Use of Nanoparticles in Vaccine Development.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna BootzVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Astrid KarbachVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-218X
Johannes SpindlerVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1503-7709
Barbara KropffVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Nina ReuterVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Heinrich StichtInstitut für Biochemie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas H WinklerNikolaus-Fiebiger-Zentrum für Molekulare Medizin, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
William J BrittDepartments of Pediatrics, Microbiology and Neurobiology, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Michael MachVirologisches Institut, Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8457-5850
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

Congenital CMV and CNS Infection Mechanisms of Protective ImmunityR01AI089956 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI William Jarvis Britt · 2011 to 2026
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI089956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is an important, ubiquitous pathogen that causes severe clinical disease in immunocompromised individuals, such as organ transplant recipients and infants infected in utero. Antiviral chemotherapy remains problematic due to toxicity of the available compounds and the emergence of viruses resistant to available antiviral therapies. Antiviral antibodies could represent a valuable alternative strategy to limit the clinical consequences of viral disease in patients. The envelope glycoprotein B (gB) of HCMV is a major antigen for the induction of virus neutralizing antibodies. However, the role of anti-gB antibodies in the course of the infection in-vivo remains unknown. We have used a murine CMV (MCMV) model to generate and study a number of anti-gB monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with differing virus-neutralizing capacities. The mAbs were found to bind to similar antigenic structures on MCMV gB that are represented in HCMV gB. When mAbs were used in immunodeficient RAG-/- hosts to limit an ongoing infection we observed a reduction in viral load both with mAbs having potent neutralizing capacity in-vitro as well as mAbs classified as non-neutralizing. In a therapeutic setting, neutralizing mAbs showed a greater capacity to reduce the viral burden compared to non-neutralizing antibodies. Efficacy was correlated with sustained concentration of virus neutralizing mAbs in-vivo rather than their in-vitro neutralizing capacity. Combinations of neutralizing mAbs further augmented the antiviral effect and were found to be as potent in protection as polyvalent serum from immune animals. Prophylactic administration of mAbs before infection was also protective and both neutralizing and non-neutralizing mAbs were equally effective in preventing lethal infection of immunodeficient mice. In summary, our data argue that therapeutic application of potently neutralizing mAbs against gB represent a strategy to modify the outcome of CMV infection in immunodeficient hosts. When present before infection, both neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-gB exhibited protective capacity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsCytomegalovirus VaccinesDisease Models, AnimalMiceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionViral Envelope ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCytomegalovirus Vaccinesglycoprotein B, SimplexvirusViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28854233
PMCPMC5595347
OpenAlexW2752748442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.