Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28853977›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Immunotherapy of house dust mite allergy.

Lin Yang, Rongfei Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sialic acid-modified der p 2 allergen exerts immunomodulatory effects on human PBMCs.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical significance of dust mite allergens.Molecular biology reports · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Broad perspectives of allergen specific immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin Yanga Department of Allergy , Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan , China.
Rongfei Zhua Department of Allergy , Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan , China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

House dust mite (HDM) is a predominant source of indoor aeroallergen worldwide, which induces allergic diseases including allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic asthma, atopic eczema and other allergic skin diseases. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only potential disease-modifying treatment of HDM allergic subjects. However, AIT remains underused due to no universally accepted allergen standardization and a shortage of rigorous clinical studies to confirm safety and efficacy. With the effort of doctors and researchers in allergy field, efficacy, safety, standardization and strategy of AIT are being continuously developed. This review presents the updated research based on recently published trials and meta-analyses.

Indexed as

HypersensitivityAllergensAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPyroglyphidaeSublingual ImmunotherapyAllergensefficacyhouse dust miteimmunotherapysafety

Identifiers

PMID28853977
PMCPMC5647988
OpenAlexW2753206231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.