Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28853597›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2017

Safety and effectiveness of antireflux surgery in obese patients.

A Tandon, R Rao, A Hotouras, Q M Nunes, M Hartley, R Gunasekera, N Howes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Salvage Options for Fundoplication Failure.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A TandonAintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
R RaoRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
A HotourasBarts Health NHS Trust , UK.
Q M NunesRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
M HartleyRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
R GunasekeraRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
N HowesRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and obesity has increased significantly in recent years. The number of antireflux procedures being carried out on people with a higher body mass index (BMI) has been rising. Evidence is conflicting for outcomes of antireflux surgery in obese patients in terms of its safety and efficacy. Given the contradictory reports, this meta-analysis was undertaken to establish the outcomes of antireflux surgery (ARS) in obese patients and its associated safety. Methods A systematic electronic search was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE

Indexed as

FundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHumansLaparoscopyObesityTreatment OutcomeAntireflux surgeryFundoplicationHigh body mass indexObesity

Identifiers

PMID28853597
PMCPMC5697051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.