ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2017
[Comparison between propofol and propofol-remifentanil sedation under target-controlled infusion for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children].
Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Anesthetic effect of propofol combined with remifentanil or sevoflurane anesthesia on patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to compare sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol and propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children. Methods A total of 60 children with anterior maxillary region impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery were divided randomly into two groups, namely, propofol group (group P, n=30) and propofol-remifentanil group (group PR, n=30). In group P, a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale reached level 3 before the actual surgery. In group PR, a remifentanil infusion with a target plasma concentration of 1 ng·mL⁻¹ was started until the operation was finished. A titrated infusion of propofol was also started until the modified OAA/S score reached level 3 before the actual surgery. The Houpt behavior scale was adopted to evaluate the cooperation of each patient in both groups. The heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and Narcotrend index, complications, adverse reactions and propofol infusion of all patients were recorded during the operation. Results The Houpt behavior scales in group PR were better than those in group P (P<0.05). The oxyhemoglobin saturation and respiratory rate in group PR were lower than that in group P (P<0.05). The heart rate, blood pressure and NI in two groups were no significant difference (P>0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression and anterograde amnesia in group PR were higher than that in group P (P<0.05). Conclusion Sedation titrated under the target-controlled infusion of propofol and that titrated under propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children are safe. The sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil is better than sedation by propofol when inhaling oxygen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.