Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852882›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2018

In situ analysis of FGFR2 mRNA and comparison with FGFR2 gene copy number by dual-color in situ hybridization in a large cohort of gastric cancer patients.

Yasutoshi Kuboki, Christoph A Schatz, Karl Koechert, Sabine Schubert, Janine Feng, Sabine Wittemer-Rump, Karl Ziegelbauer, Thomas Krahn, Akiko Kawano Nagatsuma, Atsushi Ochiai

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The beginning of the era of precision medicine for gastric cancer with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 aberration.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Review
  8. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis DetectsClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Dysregulation of PI3K/Akt/PTEN Pathway in Canine Mammary Tumor.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yasutoshi KubokiNational Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa, Kashiwa, Japan.
Christoph A SchatzBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany. christoph.schatz@bayer.com.
Karl KoechertBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine SchubertBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Janine FengVentana Medical Systems Inc., Oro Valley, AZ, USA.
Sabine Wittemer-RumpBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Karl ZiegelbauerBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KrahnBayer AG, Muellerstr. 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Akiko Kawano NagatsumaNational Cancer Center, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OchiaiNational Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa, Kashiwa, Japan.
Bayer (Germany) · DENational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPVentana Research Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) has been proposed as a target in gastric cancer. However, appropriate methods to select patients for anti-FGFR2 therapies have not yet been established.

methodsWe used in situ techniques to investigate FGFR2 mRNA expression and gene amplification in a large cohort of 1036 Japanese gastric cancer patients. FGFR2 mRNA expression was determined by RNAscope. FGFR2 gene amplification was determined by dual-color in situ hybridization (DISH).

resultsWe successfully analyzed 578 and 718 samples by DISH and RNAscope, respectively; 2% (12/578) showed strong FGFR2 gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 >10); moderate FGFR2 gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 <10; ≥2) was detected in 8% (47/578); and high FGFR2 mRNA expression of score 4 (>10 dots/cell and >10% of positive cells with dot clusters under a 20× objective) was seen in 4% (29/718). For 468 samples, both mRNA and DISH data were available. FGFR2 mRNA expression levels were associated with gene amplification; FGFR2 mRNA levels were highest in the highly amplified samples (n = 12). All highly amplified samples showed very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression (dense clusters of the signal visible under a 1× objective). Patients with very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression showed more homogeneous FGFR2 mRNA expression compared to patients with lower FGFGR2 mRNA expression. Gastric cancer patients with tumors that had an FGFR2 mRNA expression score of 4 had shorter RFS compared with score 0-3 patients.

conclusionRNAscope and DISH are suitable methods to evaluate FGFR2 status in gastric cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue slides allowed evaluation of the intratumor heterogeneity of these FGFR2 biomarkers.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCohort StudiesGene DosageHumansIn Situ HybridizationNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2RNA, MessengerStomach NeoplasmsFGFR2 protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2RNA, MessengerFibroblast growth factor receptors 2Gene amplificationIn situ hybridizationMolecular targeted therapyStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28852882
PMCPMC5906494
OpenAlexW2751702931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.