ArticleBiological cybernetics2018
Comparative study of chemical neuroanatomy of the olfactory neuropil in mouse, honey bee, and human.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sensory Perception of Six Essential Oils in Humans andMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The olfactory striae: A historical perspective on the inconsistent anatomy of the bulbar projections.Journal of anatomy · 2024Review
- Tyramine and itseLife · 2023Article
- Gain modulation and odor concentration invariance in early olfactory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Application of artificial intelligence to decode the relationships between smell, olfactory receptors and small molecules.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Learning-dependent plasticity in the antennal lobe improves discrimination and recognition of odors in the honeybee.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Experience-dependent tuning of early olfactory processing in the adult honey bee,The Journal of experimental biology · 2020Article
- Neural Networks With Motivation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
- Evolutionarily conserved anatomical and physiological properties of olfactory pathway through fourth-order neurons in a species of grasshopper (Hieroglyphus banian).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite divergent evolutionary origins, the organization of olfactory systems is remarkably similar across phyla. In both insects and mammals, sensory input from receptor cells is initially processed in synaptically dense regions of neuropil called glomeruli, where neural activity is shaped by local inhibition and centrifugal neuromodulation prior to being sent to higher-order brain areas by projection neurons. Here we review both similarities and several key differences in the neuroanatomy of the olfactory system in honey bees, mice, and humans, using a combination of literature review and new primary data. We have focused on the chemical identity and the innervation patterns of neuromodulatory inputs in the primary olfactory system. Our findings show that serotonergic fibers are similarly distributed across glomeruli in all three species. Octopaminergic/tyraminergic fibers in the honey bee also have a similar distribution, and possibly a similar function, to noradrenergic fibers in the mammalian OBs. However, preliminary evidence suggests that human OB may be relatively less organized than its counterparts in honey bee and mouse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.