Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852793›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2017

[Cartilage repair of the knee joint].

B Rath, J Eschweiler, M Betsch, G Gruber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B RathKlinik für Orthopädie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52078, Aachen, Deutschland. brath@ukaachen.de.
J EschweilerKlinik für Orthopädie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52078, Aachen, Deutschland.
M BetschKlinik für Orthopädie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52078, Aachen, Deutschland.
G GruberUniversitätsklinik für Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Sektion Sportorthopädie & Gelenkchirurgie, Landeskrankenhaus-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 1, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCartilage defects around the knee joint frequently occur in the region of the medial femoral condyle and the retropatellar cartilage surface. The distinction between local cartilage defects and large area degenerative cartilage lesions is very important for both prognosis and surgical therapy. The size and position of the lesion, the underlying pathomechanism and the age of the patient are very important factors which should be considered in the therapy algorithm for optimal cartilage defect restoration. Important cofactors such as stability, long leg axis and muscle balance should be taken into account.

aimCurrent procedures for cartilage repair of the knee joint and their results are summarized in this article. In addition, the necessity of precise and comprehensive preoperative clinical and radiological diagnostics is displayed to be able to treat co-pathologies in order to enable a successful repair of the cartilage defect. RESULTS AND

conclusionsPreoperative planning of cartilage-repair techniques usually includes x‑ray images and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. If MRI is not available, an arthro-computed tomography could be an alternative. Modern and routinely used procedures for cartilage repair at the knee joint are microfracture, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral transplantation. Successful surgical cartilage-repair surgeries require a correct and individualized indication, addressing of copathologies and a standardized rehabilitation that is adapted to the surgical procedure. Evidence-based criteria for an exact time point for the return to sports according to individually operative cartilage repair techniques currently do not exist.

Indexed as

AutograftsBone MarrowCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesFractures, StressHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingRegenerationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutologous chondrocyte transplantationAutologous matrix-induced chondrogenesisMedial femoral condyleMicrofracturePatella

Identifiers

PMID28852793
OpenAlexW2750747368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.