Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852789›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2017

A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward.

Henry T Stelfox, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Peter M Dodek, Alexis F Turgeon, Alan J Forster, Francois Lamontagne, Rob A Fowler, Andrea Soo, Sean M Bagshaw

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Core sociodemographic data variables reported in Canadian intensive care unit studies: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effectiveness of handover practices between emergency department and intensive care unit nurses.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry T StelfoxDepartments of Critical Care Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada. tstelfox@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1231-1490
Jeanna Parsons LeighDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Peter M DodekDivision of Critical Care Medicine and Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Alexis F TurgeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine Research Group), Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Alan J ForsterDepartment of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Francois LamontagneCentre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Rob A FowlerDepartments of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea SooDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Sean M BagshawDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide a 360-degree description of ICU-to-ward transfers.

methodsProspective cohort study of 451 adults transferred from a medical-surgical ICU to a hospital ward in 10 Canadian hospitals July 2014-January 2016. Transfer processes documented in the medical record. Patient (or delegate) and provider (ICU/ward physician/nurse) perspectives solicited by survey 24-72 h after transfer.

resultsMedical records (100%) and survey responses (ICU physicians-80%, ICU nurses-80%, ward physicians-46%, ward nurses-64%, patients-74%) were available for most transfers. The median time from initiation to completion of transfer was 25 h (IQR 6-52). ICU physicians and nurses reported communicating with counterparts via telephone (78 and 75%) when transfer was requested (82 and 24%) or accepted (31 and 59%) and providing more elements of clinical information than ward physicians (mean 4.7 vs. 3.9, p < 0.001) and nurses (5.0 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001) reported receiving. Patients were more likely to report satisfaction with the transfer when they received more information (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18-1.48), had their questions addressed (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.33-11.84), met the ward physician prior to transfer (OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.90-7.33), and were assessed by a nurse within 1 h of ward arrival (OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.29-9.66). Recommendations for improvement included having a documented care plan travel with the patient (all stakeholders), standardized face-to-face handover (physicians), avoiding transfers at shift change (nurses) and informing patients about pending transfers in advance (patients).

conclusionsICU-to-ward transfers are characterized by failures of patient flow and communication; experienced differently by patients, ICU/ward physicians and nurses, with distinct suggestions for improvement.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsCanadaContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHospital UnitsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPatient TransferProfessional-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCommunicationContinuity of patient careCritical carePatient handoffPatient transfer

Identifiers

PMID28852789
OpenAlexW2753170989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.