Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852696›Full record

ReviewACS central science2017

The Proteasome in Modern Drug Discovery: Second Life of a Highly Valuable Drug Target.

Philipp M Cromm, Craig M Crews

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Synthesis and Application of a Versatile Immunoproteasome Activity Probe.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anti-filarial efficacy ofRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in Optically Controlled PROTAC.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp M CrommDepartment of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Craig M CrewsDepartment of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Yale University · US

Funding

Inducing Proximity: An Emerging Paradigm for New Therapeutic ModalitiesR35CA197589 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIG M CREWS · 2015 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the central figure of the cellular protein degradation machinery, the proteasome is critical for cell survival. Having been extensively targeted for inhibition, the constitutive proteasome has proven its role as a highly valuable drug target. However, recent advances in the protein homeostasis field suggest that additional chapters can be added to this successful story. For example, selective immunoproteasome inhibition promises high clinical efficacy for autoimmune disorders and inflammation, and proteasome inhibitors might serve as novel therapeutics for malaria or other microorganisms. Furthermore, utilizing the destructive force of the proteasome for selective degradation of essential drivers of human disorders has opened up a new and exciting area of drug discovery. Thus, the field of proteasome drug discovery still holds exciting questions to be answered and does not simply end with inhibiting the constitutive proteasome.

Identifiers

PMID28852696
PMCPMC5571462
OpenAlexW2744284720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.