Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852193›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

An enhanced C. elegans based platform for toxicity assessment.

Huajiang Xiong, Catherine Pears, Alison Woollard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. β-alanine betaine and nAChRs inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expanding thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Dietary mycotoxin toxicity inAdvances in neurotoxicology · 2026
    Article
  13. EvaluatingmicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Systematic optimization ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huajiang XiongDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
Catherine PearsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK. catherine.pears@bioch.ox.ac.uk.
Alison WoollardDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK. alison.woollard@bioch.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/M000834/1NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a well-defined regulatory framework governing the approval of chemicals for use as pharmaceuticals or release into the environment. Toxicity assessment is thus a major hurdle in the compound discovery pipeline, currently involving large scale animal testing. The search for alternative testing platforms is therefore an important priority. We have developed a convenient, low cost assay utilising the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, to rapidly assess both acute toxicity and developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART). However the worm is protected by a robust cuticle that forms a barrier to chemical uptake. We assessed mutants with altered cuticle properties to identify sensitized strains optimized for toxicity assays. Evaluating the trade-off between increased permeability and reduced fitness identifies bus-5(br19) as the most suitable strain for chemical exposure. We demonstrate the applicability of this assay for a range of chemicals with differing properties, including a modified exposure protocol for volatile or less soluble compounds. This work enhances the effectiveness of C. elegans for convenient toxicity assessment, which could contribute to a reduction in the use of vertebrates particularly at the crucial early stages of product development. Strains identified in this work will also enhance the sensitivity of C. elegans based drug discovery platforms.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMutationPermeabilitySolubility

Identifiers

PMID28852193
PMCPMC5575006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.