Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28852092›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Change in sensitivity to visual error in superior colliculus during saccade adaptation.

Yoshiko Kojima, Robijanto Soetedjo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The olivary input to the cerebellum dissociates sensory events from movement plans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Reward Prediction Error Modulates Saccade Vigor.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Elimination of the error signal in the superior colliculus impairs saccade motor learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoshiko KojimaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, Washington, 98195-7330, USA. ykojima@u.washington.edu.
Robijanto SoetedjoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, Washington, 98195-7330, USA.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Neurophysiology of Saccade Adaptation: The Role of Superior ColliculusR01EY019258 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOETEDJO, ROBIJANTO · 2009 to 2018
$3.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019258NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements provide a valuable model to study the brain mechanisms underlying motor learning. If a target is displaced surreptitiously while a saccade is underway, the saccade appears to be in error. If the error persists gradual neuronal adjustments cause the eye movement again to land near the target. This saccade adaptation typically follows an exponential time course, i.e., adaptation speed slows as adaptation progresses, indicating that the sensitivity to error decreases during adaptation. Previous studies suggested that the superior colliculus (SC) sends error signals to drive saccade adaptation. The objective of this study is to test whether the SC error signal is related to the decrease in the error sensitivity during adaptation. We show here that the visual activity of SC neurons, which is induced by a constant visual error that drives adaptation, decreases during saccade adaptation. This decrease of sensitivity to visual error was not correlated with the changes of primary saccade amplitude. Therefore, a possible interpretation of this result is that the reduction of visual sensitivity of SC neurons contributes an error sensitivity signal that could help control the saccade adaptation process.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalSaccadesVisual PerceptionAction PotentialsAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsSuperior Colliculi

Identifiers

PMID28852092
PMCPMC5574973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.