Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851955›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Circulating endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles mediate the acute phase response and sickness behaviour associated with CNS inflammation.

Yvonne Couch, Naveed Akbar, Jay Roodselaar, Matthew C Evans, Chris Gardiner, Ian Sargent, Ignacio A Romero, Adrian Bristow, Alastair M Buchan, Norman Haughey and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cell-cell communication: new insights and clinical implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. The isolation of VCAM-1Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
  6. The Haptoglobin Response after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. (Epi)transcriptomics in cardiovascular and neurological complications of COVID-19.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yvonne CouchAcute Stroke Programme, RDM-Investigative Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. yvonne.couch@rdm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5623-5568
Naveed AkbarDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, RDM, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jay RoodselaarDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9321-7836
Matthew C EvansDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Chris GardinerHaemostasis Research Unit, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-0062
Ian SargentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ignacio A RomeroDepartment of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Adrian BristowNIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, UK.
Alastair M BuchanAcute Stroke Programme, RDM-Investigative Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Norman HaugheyDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Daniel C AnthonyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1380-6655
University of Oxford · GBJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBThe Open University · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain injury elicits a systemic acute-phase response (APR), which is responsible for co-ordinating the peripheral immunological response to injury. To date, the mechanisms responsible for signalling the presence of injury or disease to selectively activate responses in distant organs were unclear. Circulating endogenous extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increased after brain injury and have the potential to carry targeted injury signals around the body. Here, we examined the potential of EVs, isolated from rats after focal inflammatory brain lesions using IL-1β, to activate a systemic APR in recipient naïve rats, as well as the behavioural consequences of EV transfer. Focal brain lesions increased EV release, and, following isolation and transfer, the EVs were sequestered by the liver where they initiated an APR. Transfer of blood-borne EVs from brain-injured animals was also enough to suppress exploratory behaviours in recipient naïve animals. EVs derived from brain endothelial cell cultures treated with IL-1β also activated an APR and altered behaviour in recipient animals. These experiments reveal that inflammation-induced circulating EVs derived from endothelial cells are able to initiate the APR to brain injury and are sufficient to generate the associated sickness behaviours, and are the first demonstration that EVs are capable of modifying behavioural responses.

Indexed as

Illness BehaviorAcute-Phase ReactionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEncephalitisEndothelial CellsExtracellular VesiclesHepatitisInflammation MediatorsKupffer CellsMaleRatsCytokinesInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID28851955
PMCPMC5575066
OpenAlexW2746854706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.